Once you add a site to your Favorites, the site is then available to you whenever you have your browser running.
It is also possible to arrange Favorites into folders and to file new sites into the folders.
Instructions on how to do this can be found using the Help menu on your browser screen.
Whenever you wish to go to a favourite site click on the Favorites/Bookmarks button and choose the site you are looking for. This technique is particularly useful for computers you use at home. It isn't really suitable for collecting Favorites on The University of Adelaide computers, as it is likely that any bookmarks you collect will be removed by other students or University staff.
Information about search engines.
Spider's apprentice.
http://www.monash.com/spidap.html
Sites that teach use of the Web.
TONIC The Online Netskills Interactive Course
from University of Newcastle, UK.
Free, but registration required.
http://www.netskills.ac.uk/onlinecourses/tonic
Internet/WWW glossaries.
Matisse's Glossary of Internet Terms
http://www.matisse.net/files/glossary.html
Citing Electronic References
Citation Styles Online
http://www.bedfordstmartins.com/online/citex.html
How to cite web sites, email, newsgroups etc. in various styles
From Bedford St Martins
Style Guides and Resources
http://www.ifla.org/I/training/citation/citing.htm
How to cite electronic sources in lots of styles
From IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions)
Peer Review
Most academic journals use peer review to ensure the quality of articles published. When authors submit articles for publication in a journal, the editors send the article to experts in the field. These experts will usually suggest changes to the article, examine the the methods and conclusions of the authors, and check that important literature in the field is cited. The article won't be published until the authors satisfy the requirements of peer review. While the internet might give you some ideas on a subject it is always much better to make sure that any articles you find are peer reviewed.
The quality of information found on the internet varies greatly. Most of the material has never undergone peer review, and you must be very careful to ensure that the information is correct. Below are some simple checks that you can use to help decide on the quality of a site.
How up to date is the site
Most good sites will indicate when they were last updated. If recency is an important indication of quality for you, check this.
Authors/Compilers
Is the name of the person responsible for the site provided? If someone claims responsibility for a site, they are more likely to make an effort to ensure quality. An email address should be included so that you can ask for further information.
The qualifications of the authors/Compilers should be included so that you know that they are qualified.
Institutional site
Sites that are published under the auspices of well respected institutions or funding bodies are likely to be of good quality. Is there a link to the institution?
Scope
Does the site indicate the extent, depth, and time period covered by the information presented? Are these relevant to your needs?
Accuracy of Information
Can you check the accuracy of some of the information provided? If some of the information is wrong can you trust the rest?
Objectivity
If there is more than one opinion on a topic are all of them included on the site? Are there links to other sites on this topic?
Is the site designed to change opinions?
Is there advertising on the site, and does it relate to the subject matter?
Sources
Are the sources of information on the site referenced?
Audience
Does the site indicate who the information is for? Is it pitched at a higher education, or professional level?
Searchable
Large sites should have 'fuzzy' search engines, smaller sites should have a table of contents.
Here is a web site that will help you decide on the quality of information
Evaluating Medical Information on the Web From the Human Genome Project Information