University Policies and Proceedures
Printer View
Text Zoom: S | M | L
You are here: University Policies > Research Centres and Research Institutes Framework > 1.7 Research Centres or Research Institutes Reviews Template

Research Centres and Research Institutes Framework

1.7 Research Centre or Research Institute Reviews Template

Each Research Centre or Research Institute is required to have a major review early in the final year of its establishment period. However, the Executive Dean (in the case of a Research Centre) and the DVC&VP(R) (in the case of a Research Centre or Research Institute) may initiate a review at any time. If renewal beyond the original establishment period is not sought, the final year review is not necessary, although a final Annual Report is still required. Review processes are required to address the criteria listed below.

1. Establishing a Review Committee

Responsibility: Executive Dean for a Centre or DVC&VP(R) for an Institute

Establish a review committee with the following minimum composition:

a) One external member with exceptional standing in the academic area of the Centre/Institute, as Chair of the Review Committee;

b) A senior researcher within the University, from a Faculty not associated with the Centre/Institute;

c) Any additional members that the Executive Dean or DVC&VP(R) considers appropriate; and

d) for Centres only, the Associate Dean (Research) from the responsible Faculty.

2. Documents for review

Responsibility: Director of Research Centre or Research Institute

Arrange for the Review Committee to be provided with the following information:

a) A copy of the original establishment documentation;

b) Copies of previous annual reports;

c) Relevant data pertaining to performance;

d) A written submission from the Director outlining the major achievements and research impact of the Research Centre or Research Institute, and proposed future developments; and

e) Any additional information as requested by the Review Committee.

3. Review Committee terms of reference

Responsibility: Review Committee

a) Review the purpose, goals and priorities of the Centre/Institute and assess whether those goals remain appropriate to the University's strategic aims.

b) Review the activities and achievements of the Centre/Institute in relation to its own statement of aims, objectives and functions, and the indicators stated in the original establishment proposal.

c) Evaluate the research performance of the Centre/Institute in the context of trends in the area and the performance of comparable structures elsewhere.

d) Review the organisational structure of the Centre/Institute in the context of its research and other functions, and the effectiveness of its governance and management.

e) Review the role played by the Centre/Institute in relation to relevant industry and government bodies, and/or in service to the profession and the community.

f) Review the quality and extent of the involvement of the Centre/Institute in research training and its support for Early Career Researchers.

g) Recommend, in light of its performance, whether the Centre/Institute should continue and, if so, in what form.

h) For a Research Centre, present a report to the Executive Dean, and for a Research Institute present a report to the DVC&VP(R) and Institute Director.

4. Outcomes of review

Responsibility: Executive Dean responsible for Research Centre

a) In the case of a Research Centre review, prepare a written response to the Review Committee's report and submit both documents to the DVC&VP(R) for consideration.

b) Oversee the implementation of any review recommendations approved by the DVC&VP(R).

Responsibility: Director, Research Institute

c) In the case of a Research Institute, present the Review Report to the Institute Board and assist the Chair of the Institute Board to prepare a written response to the Report. Submit this to the DVC&VP(R). If the DVC&VP(R) is a member of the Institute Board, he/she must not be involved in this part of the process.

Responsibility: DVC&VP(R)

d) Consider all recommendations made in the Report and the response, and approve a final set of recommendations for implementation, including a determination whether to renew the Centre/Institute for a further specified period (conditionally or otherwise), or re-establish the Centre/Institute in another form, or disestablish the Centre/Institute.

e) In the case of a recommendation to disestablish the Centre/Institute or establish it in another form, submit to the VC&P for approval.

f) Inform the responsible Executive Dean, the Director of the Centre/Institute and, where applicable, the Institute Board, of the final decisions reached during the above process.

g) For a Research Institute, oversee the implementation of any review recommendations.



This document is a component of Research Centres and Research Institutes Framework

Policy Control Information

RMO File No. 2007/1778
Policy custodian Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Research)
Responsible policy officer Director, Research Branch
Endorsed by Academic Board
Approved by Vice-Chancellor and President
Procedures approved by Vice-Chancellor and President
Related Policies Attachment 1: Research Centres and Research Institutes Guidelines and Criteria https://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/984/?dsn=policy.document;field=data;id=4762;m=view

University Owned Entities Policy
http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/882/

Superceded Policies Policy on Research Centres and Other Research Groups
Effective from 5 May 2010
Review Date 31 May 2013
Contact for queries about the policy Contact Director, Research Branch on ext. 35137

Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled. Please refer to the University Policy and Procedures website for the latest version.