edited by Paul Babie and Neville Rochow
$55.00 | 2012 | Paperback | 978-0-9871718-0-1 | 464 pp
FREE | 2012 | Ebook (PDF) | 978-0-9871718-1-8 | 464 pp
"At the heart of this judiciously edited collection of essays is the contentious debate in Australia about whether to adopt a national bill of rights.
Many readers will be surprised to learn that Australia lacks a national bill of rights; it is the only modern Western nation without one.
Paul Babie, Neville Rochow and their colleagues in the new Research Unit for the Study of Law, Religion and Society at the University of Adelaide have brought together a strong cast of Australian and international scholars to put the Australian issues in sharp comparative relief."
John Witte, Jr, Emory University, Atlanta
'The Australian Constitution contains no guarantee of freedom of religion or freedom of conscience. Indeed, it contains very few provisions dealing with rights — in essence, it is a Constitution that confines itself mainly to prescribing a framework for federal government, setting out the various powers of government and limiting them as between federal and state governments and the three branches of government without attempting to define the rights of citizens except in minor respects. […]
Whether Australia should have a national bill of rights has been a controversial issue for quite some time. This is despite the fact that Australia has acceded to the ICCPR, as well as the First Optional Protocol to the ICCPR, thereby accepting an international obligation to bring Australian law into line with the ICCPR, an obligation that Australia has not discharged. Australia is the only country in the Western world without a national bill of rights.4 The chapters that follow in this book debate the situation in Australia and in various other Western jurisdictions.'
From Foreword by The Hon Sir Anthony Mason AC KBE: Human Rights and Courts
Call (08) 8313 1721 and pay over the phone with Visa or Mastercard.