Skip to content

Fluoride Issues

On this page:

Child Fluoride Study Mark II

The Child Fluoride Study (CFS Mark II) investigates the effectiveness of consuming fluoridated water in reducing children’s caries experience and extends the previous CFS in 1991. New methodological issues are being dealt with, which will lead to the improved precision of both exposure and disease variables in the study.
The objectives of the CFS Mark II are to establish the prevalence of dental caries among 5–15‑year‑old children and analyse their association with differing exposure to fluoridated water supplies and other sources of fluoride. The duration of the study is three years (±12 months) and involves at least 30,000 children in South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria and Queensland.

Contact Person

Professor John Spencer
122 Frome Street
ARCPOH, Dental school, the University of Adelaide
SA 5005
Email: john.spencer@adelaide.edu.au

Jason Armfield
122 Frome Street
ARCPOH, Dental school, the University of Adelaide
SA 5005
Email: jason.armfield@adelaide.edu.au

Fluoridation of Water Supplies in Remote Aboriginal Communities in the Northern Territory

In collaboration with the Menzies School of Health Research and the Northern Territory Department of Health and Community Services and the Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, this project aims to improve knowledge on the fluoride levels in remote community water supplies in the NT, the oral health status of children living in these communities, and the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of a small scale remote water fluoridation plant.

The project objectives are to:

    • document the fluoride status of water supplies to populations in rural and remote Northern Territory
    • identify rural and remote Aboriginal communities at risk of caries and with exposure to negligible concentrations of fluoride in their public water supplies
    • assess the impact on oral health of introducing water fluoridation so as to build an evidence-base for the effectiveness of water fluoridation among rural and remote Aboriginal children and children living in similar settings elsewhere
    • document the costs of implementation and maintenance of a water fluoridation plant so as to establish the feasibility and cost-effectiveness in small rural Aboriginal communities.

Contact Person

Professor John Spencer
122 Frome Street
ARCPOH, Dental school, the University of Adelaide
SA 5005
Email: john.spencer@adelaide.edu.au

Fluoride Exposure, Dental Fluorosis and Caries Among South Australian Children

The effective use of fluoride in the prevention of dental cariesLink to external website requires balancing the positive benefits against the negative risks. The desire to maintain the caries preventive benefits of fluoride at the same time as reducing the risk of dental fluorosis led to policy initiatives in Australia in the early 1990s to target a reduction in exposure to fluoride from discretionary sources, namely from fluoride toothpastes, infant formula and fluoride supplementation of children up to six years old. If the initiatives have been widely implemented and were effective, the prevalence of fluorosis among children born at or after their introduction would be reduced without significant increase in caries experience.

Aims

The specific objectives of the research project were:

      • to describe the prevalence and severity of fluorosis among 8–13-year-old South Australian children in 2002/2003
      • to evaluate the effect of change in fluoride exposure in early childhood on the prevalence and severity of fluorosis
      • to quantify the perception of oral health and dental appearance among children and their parents in relation to fluorosis and other contributing factors
      • to evaluate the effect of change in fluoride exposure in childhood on dental caries experience
      • to identify appropriate measures to balance fluoride exposure by evaluating the “trade-off” between  caries and fluorosis.

Hypothesis

The principal hypothesis being tested in this study was that the policies initiated in the early 1990s were effective in reducing the prevalence and severity of fluorosis without any effect on dental caries experience.

Methods

Study Design and Data Collection

This research project was nested in a larger population-based study, the Child Oral Health Study (COHS) in Australia 2002-2005. The parent study’s sample was chosen using multistage, stratified random selection with probability of selection proportional to population size. Fluoride exposure history was retrospectively collected by a parental questionnaire detailing past exposure to all sources of fluoride. The COHS fieldwork in South Australia has achieved a response rate of 67%.

This nested study sample (n=1401) was selected from the pool of South Australian COHS participants. Children were selected by year of birth to form three birth cohort groups: born in 1989/90; 1991/92; and 1993/94. Subjects were approached in two further stages: a child and parent dental health perception questionnaire, and a clinical examination for fluorosis. Some 898 children took part in stage one. Among those, a single trained dentist examined 677 children for fluorosis under clinic conditions using two indices (the Fluorosis Risk Index [Pendrys, 1990] and the TF Index ]Thylstrup and Fejerskov, 1978]). The Dental Aesthetic Index score (DAI) was also recorded. Caries experience from all previous visits at school dental clinics was extracted from paper-based and computerised clinical records to enable calculation of dmfs/DMFS scores at two anchor ages: six and eight years, and at the time of the study.

Data Analysis

Data were re-weighted to correct for differences in sampling ratios and participation rates so as to represent the SA child population. Fluoride exposure measurements were calculated from the COHS parental questionnaire data. These measurements were percent lifetime exposure to fluoride in water and patterns of discretionary fluoride use. Fluorosis data were used to calculate the prevalence and severity of fluorosis. Caries dmfs/DMFS scores were calculated at different ages to enable comparison between birth cohorts.

Univariate and bivariate statistics were used to describe the population estimates of fluorosis and caries. Stratified analyses were also employed to explore association between different fluoride exposures and fluorosis and caries. The trends of fluorosis and caries between birth cohorts were examined at different time points. Multivariate models were generated to identify risk factors for fluorosis and caries. Population attributable risks for fluorosis were calculated for exposures to fluoride. A trade-off between fluorosis and caries with different fluoride exposure sources was examined in stratified analyses. Benefits and risks of exposures were then evaluated.

Results

A higher proportion of children in later birth cohorts used low fluoride toothpaste, and used a smaller amount of toothpaste when they commenced toothbrushing. There was also a trend of reduction in percent lifetime exposure to fluoridated water. A total of 145 children (25.8%) had a TF score of 1+ and 57 (11.4%) had a TF score of 2+. There was a significant decline in the prevalence of fluorosis across the three successive birth cohorts. This decline was found to be related to the use of low concentration fluoride toothpaste. Risk factors for fluorosis, defined by the two indices for fluorosis, were use of standard fluoride toothpaste, eating and/or licking toothpaste, and exposure to fluoride in water. Estimated population attributable risks indicated that exposure to fluoridated water was attributed to 40% and 53% of fluorosis cases defined as having a TF score of 1+ and 2+, respectively. Eating and/or licking toothpaste in early years was attributed to more than a third of cases of fluorosis. Another quarter of fluorosis cases could be attributed to the use of 1000-ppm fluoride toothpaste when toothbrushing was started.

Mean deciduous caries dmfs (SD) at age six and eight were 1.45 (3.11) and 2.46 (3.93), respectively. The “trade-off” between fluorosis and caries with exposure to water fluoridation was strong, namely reducing exposure to fluoride in water could reduce the prevalence of fluorosis as well as significantly increase caries experience. On the other hand, commencing toothbrushing between 18 to 30 months of age, use of low fluoride toothpaste, and preventing eating/licking of toothpaste could reduce the prevalence of fluorosis without a significant increase in caries experience. Perception of tooth colour was related to fluorosis scores on upper anterior teeth. Perception of poorer oral health was related to dental caries experience and occlusal traits. Dental fluorosis experience did not have a negative impact on perception of oral health of the affected children or their parent.

Conclusion

The study drew the following conclusions:

      • A quarter of children aged 8 to 13 in South Australia had some fluorosis. The vast majority of fluorosis cases had a TF score of 1 or 2. The prevalence of fluorosis in the study population was lower than that reported from other comparable studies.
      • There was a marked decline in the prevalence of fluorosis across the birth cohorts. This decline was found to be related to the increased use of low concentration fluoride toothpaste in the latest birth cohort.
      • There was a tendency of increasing dental caries experience in the study population. This might be explained mainly by a reduction in fluoride exposure, namely reduced the percent of lifetime exposure to fluoride in water, and use of lower concentration of toothpaste.
      • Exposure to fluoridated water remained one of the most effective measures against caries, which if modified to prevent fluorosis could result in significant increase in caries. Eliminating swallowing of toothpaste such as eating and/or licking toothpaste could significantly reduce the prevalence of fluorosis without impact on caries experience.
      • The benefits of water fluoridation were affirmed. Recommendations regarding the use of fluoride toothpaste should take into account exposure to fluoridated water to achieve a more appropriate combination of exposures to fluoride to balance the risk and benefit of fluoride use.

Contact Person

Dr Loc Do
122 Frome Street
ARCPOH, Dental school, the University of Adelaide
SA 5005
Email: loc.do@adelaide.edu.au

Publications From Study

Do, L.G. and A. Spencer (2007). "Oral health-related quality of life of children by dental caries and fluorosis experience." J Public Health Dent 67(3): 132-9.
Do, L.G. and A.J. Spencer (2007). "Decline in the prevalence of dental fluorosis among South Australian children." Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 35(4): 282-91.
Do, L.G. and A.J. Spencer (2007). "Risk-benefit balance in the use of fluoride among young children." J Dent Res 86(8): 723-8.
Spencer, A.J. and L.G. Do (2006). "Changing risk factors for fluorosis among South Australian children." Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. Accepted Nov 2006.

A Community Trial of Fluoridated Powdered Milk in Chile

Aims or Brief Descriptions

Objective

To demonstrate the effectiveness of a dental caries prevention program on the primary dentition of Chilean rural children, using fluoridated powdered milk and milk derivatives.

Methods

Fluoridated milk and milk-cereal was given to about 1000 preschool children in Codegua, a rural community located in the 6th Region of Chile, using the standard National Complementary Feeding Program (PNAC). The daily fluoride dose from fluoridated powdered milk was estimated at 0.25 mg for infants (0–2 years old), 0.5 mg for children aged 2–3 years and 0.75 for children aged 3–6 years. Cross-sectional samples of children aged 3–6 years were taken from Codegua (study community) from 1994 to 1999 and from La Punta (control community) from 1997 and 1999.

Findings

Results

Significant reductions (72%) were observed in the dmfs indices in the 3–6-year-old groups in Codegua, when comparing 1999 with 1994 data. In 1999, children in the study community showed significantly lower dmfs than children in the control community (41%). The proportion of caries-free children in the study community increased after 4 years of program implementation (from 22.0% to 48.4%). Conclusion: Under Chilean rural conditions, fluoridation of powdered milk distributed through the PNAC is an effective caries prevention alternative for areas where water fluoridation might not be feasible

Involved Organisations

School of Health, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia;
Department of Public Nutrition, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, (INTA), University of Chile, Santiago, Chile

Contact Person for Further Information

Rodrigo Marino
Senior Research Fellow
Cooperative Research Centre for Oral Health Sciences
The University of Melbourne
Phone: 9344 1580
Email: rmarino@unimelb.edu.au

Publications From Study

Rodrigo Mariño, Alberto Villa, Sonia Guerrero (2001) “A community trial of fluoridated powdered milk in Chile” Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 29 (6): 435–442

return to top
Oral Health Promotion Clearinghouse Unit
Address

ARCPOH
Adelaide Dental School 
Level 9, Adelaide Health and Medical Sciences building 
The University of Adelaide
SA 5005 AUSTRALIA

Contact

T: +61 8 8313 3291 
Email