TECHCOMM 7030 - Logistics & Supply Chain Management

North Terrace Campus - Semester 1 - 2014

The objectives are to develop understanding of maintenance and support planning, ensure Integrated Logistic Support concerns are effectively considered in the system, and address acquisition and development cycle, have competence in ILS techniques and understand the implications of an extended supply chain and design systems to address these. The content includes the role of the various components of logistics including systems and concurrent engineering, integrated logistic support analysis, including reliability and maintainability, measures of logistic effectiveness, including reliability, maintainability factors, supply support factors, test and support equipment factors. The role of logistics in the design and development phases, reliability modeling, FMEA and FMECA, fault tree analysis, reliability centred maintenance, and configuration management are addressed. Human factors in ILS, integration of the supply chain, flow of information, materials, services, manpower and money across the supply chain, coordinating technology across tiered suppliers, creation of trust, enterprise architecture in the supply chain, waste and minimising transaction costs are addressed

  • General Course Information
    Course Details
    Course Code TECHCOMM 7030
    Course Logistics & Supply Chain Management
    Coordinating Unit Entrepreneurship, Commercialisation & Innov Centre
    Term Semester 1
    Level Postgraduate Coursework
    Location/s North Terrace Campus
    Units 3
    Assessment Assignments
    Course Staff

    Course Coordinator: Emeritus Professor Vernon Ireland

    Name: Kerri di Sario

    Short Bio:

    Kerri is a professional Engineer with wide-ranging skills, knowledge and experience that extends through project management, systems and systems support engineering, business and commercial, business development and marketing, quality, maintenance management, and human resources management. She has worked within both the public and private sectors, holds a Bachelor of Engineering (Electronics), and is a certified PRINCE2®1 Practitioner.
     
    Email: kerri.disario@adelaide.edu.au

    Phone: +61 (0) 400 115 785

    1 PRINCE2® is a registered trademark of AXELOS Limited
    Course Timetable

    The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from Course Planner.

    Opening intensive:
    Monday 24th & Tuesday 25th March 2014
    9am-6pm
    Masonic Basement B03 West

    Closing intensive:
    Monday 28th & Tuesday 29th April 2014
    9am-6pm
    Masonic Basement B03 West
  • Learning Outcomes
    Course Learning Outcomes
    The overall aim of this course is to develop an understanding of logistics from a system perspective. At the end of this course, students should have:
    1 knowledge and understanding of the concept of “systems” and the total system life-cycle for logistics and supply chains, with consideration of standards and world’s best practice
    2 knowledge and ability to capture, interpret and document the supportability requirements and activities for the acquisition and development of logistics systems and supply chains
    3 knowledge and ability to develop the requirements for supportability leading to the acquisition, development and implementation of logistics systems and supply chains
    4 knowledge and ability to promote team work and effective communications in the development and support of logistics systems and the extended supply chain
    5 knowledge and understanding of the application of design techniques and appropriate technologies to support the development and operation of logistics systems and the extended supply chain
    6 appreciation of the benefits of continuing personal and professional development in the rapidly developing and increasingly complex field of logistics and supply chain management
    7 appreciation of the leadership roles and knowledge of the skills required to encourage wider community involvement in the successful and sustainable development and support of logistics systems and the extended supply chain
    8 appreciation of ethical, social and cultural issues and an understanding of the implication of these issues in the sustainable development and support of logistics systems and the extended supply chain.
    University Graduate Attributes

    This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:

    University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s)
    Knowledge and understanding of the content and techniques of a chosen discipline at advanced levels that are internationally recognised. 1
    The ability to locate, analyse, evaluate and synthesise information from a wide variety of sources in a planned and timely manner. 2
    An ability to apply effective, creative and innovative solutions, both independently and cooperatively, to current and future problems. 3
    Skills of a high order in interpersonal understanding, teamwork and communication. 4
    A proficiency in the appropriate use of contemporary technologies. 5
    A commitment to continuous learning and the capacity to maintain intellectual curiosity throughout life. 6
    A commitment to the highest standards of professional endeavour and the ability to take a leadership role in the community. 7
    An awareness of ethical, social and cultural issues within a global context and their importance in the exercise of professional skills and responsibilities. 8
  • Learning Resources
    Required Resources

    The University’s preferred textbook supplier is Unibooks: http://www.unibooks.com.au/ 

    Text book:
    Blanchard, Benjamin, Logistics Engineering and Management, 6th Edition, 2004, Pearson Prentice Hall.

    There is a wide range of material on the course topic, including course notes, slides, and readings for completion of Assessment 2, available on MyUni.

    Recommended Resources

    Library Resources
    The University of Adelaide’s Barr Smith Library provides a range of learning resources including texts, journals, periodicals, magazines, and access to online databases and information services. It also offers a virtual library which is accessible via the University’s website. The University Library web page is: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/library/ 

    From this link, you are able to access the Library's electronic resources.

    Other resources
    If you are a member of the PMI (http://www.pmi.org/Membership.aspx) you will “gain exclusive access to PMI publications and our global standards*, networking options with our chapters and online communities of practice, and leadership and volunteer opportunities. You’ll also receive discounts on certification exams and renewals, as well as our professional development offerings.” Student membership is USD$40 to join and USD$30 to renew.

    * Log in to access complimentary read-only PDFs of all of PMI's published standards or take advantage of discounts on paperback editions
    http://www.pmi.org/PMBOK-Guide-and-Standards/Standards-Library-of-PMI-Global-Standards.aspx 

    Online Learning

    MyUni is the University of Adelaide's online learning environment. It is used to support traditional face-to-face lectures, tutorials and workshops at the University. MyUni provides access to various features including announcements, course materials, discussion boards and assessments for each online course of study (see: https://myuni.adelaide.edu.au)

  • Learning & Teaching Activities
    Learning & Teaching Modes

    This course is offered in blended learning mode with the face-to-face component offered as intensives.

    Workload

    The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.

    As a guide, a 3 unit course comprises a total of 156 hours work (this includes face-to-face contact, any online components, and self directed study).

    Learning Activities Summary

    See Learning Activity Summary table in MyUni.

  • Assessment

    The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:

    1. Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
    2. Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
    3. Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
    4. Assessment must maintain academic standards.

    Assessment Summary

    An overview of the course assessment appears in the following Table. Details appear in the following section:

    Assessment No.Form of Assessment/Collaborative TaskLength (in word count)WeightingDue DateOutcomes being assessed
    1 Questions with Short Answers (Logistics and Supply Chain Management) 1000 words 15% 13/04/14 1, 2, 3, 4
    2 Analysis of a Case Study 1500 words 30% 04/05/14 1, 2, 5, 6
    3 Questions with Short Answers (Logistics and Supply Chain Management) 1000 words 15% 18/05/14 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    4 Negotiated Individual Investigation 3000 words 40% 08/06/14 1-8
    Total 100%
    Assessment Related Requirements

    Students must complete all course assessment requirements and must attend lectures to be eligible to pass the course.

    Course results are subject to moderation by the ECIC Board of Examiners

    Assessment Detail

     Assessment 1: Questions with Short Answers – Logistics and Supply Chain Management
    Weighting: 15%
    Due Dates: 13 Apr 14
    Submission Details: Online through MyUni

    Task:
    Complete the following.

    Select a business or system of your choice, then:

    1. Briefly describe its purpose and the mission to be accomplished (i.e. operational scenario).

    2. Describe the supply chain for your business or system of choice. Who are the suppliers, distributors and producers in this supply chain?

    3. Describe the important trade-offs that exist in this supply chain. Why do you consider them to be important?

    4. Identify and describe your business’ or system’s logistics functions/ activities. Consideration should be given to the following types of functions/ activities where relevant: operational requirements, maintenance requirements (including your customers’ if your business is supplying a product that requires maintenance), performance measures, capital assets, supply chain requirements, system installation (site), system upgrade, material recycling and/or disposal.

    5. In your business or system, what is the relationship (impact of one on the other) between reliability and maintainability? Reliability and human factors? Maintainability and human factors? Reliability and the supply chain? Maintainability and the supply chain? Human factors and the supply chain? Consider all the above cases in your answer.

    Scope:
    This assignment will assess your understanding of the Logistics and Supply Chain Management Opening Intensive course topics.

    Length and Presentation:
    Approximately 1000 words

    Criteria by which your assessment will be marked:
    The standards by which the assignment will be assessed include accuracy, interest, structure, clarity and completeness (e.g. referencing, grammar, etc).

    Learning objectives with this assessment (refer to section 2.1): 1, 2, 3, 4


    Assessment 2: Analysis of a Case Study
    Weighting: 30%
    Due Dates: 4 May 14
    Submission Details: Online through MyUni

    Task:
    Select one of the following case studies and answer the associated question(s). It is highly recommended that you use the Harvard method of citation and reference list formulation in your submitted work.
    A. Sandberg, Anna, et al, Gripen: with focus on availability performance and life support cost over the product life cycle, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 5 No. 4, 1999
    (1) Discuss the Swedish Defence Materiel Administration’s (FMVs) approach to designing the new aircraft system and include the following in your discussion:
    What logistics and logistics management considerations were undertaken during the program?
    What were the design outputs resulting from logistics considerations?
    How does the FMV approach compare/ contrast to Blanchard’s approach to Logistics Engineering and Management?
    Would you describe this program as having successfully implemented a logistics approach to a complex system? Why/ Why not?

    B. White, James W., Application of New Management Concepts to the Development of F/A-18 Aircraft, John Hopkins APL Technical Digest, Volume 18, Number 1 (1997)
    (1) Discuss the application of new organisational and supplier management concepts to the development of F/A-18 aircraft and include the following in your discussion:
    What were the outputs resulting from the logistics considerations?
    How do these new management concepts compare/ contrast to Blanchard’s approach to Logistics Engineering and Management?
    Would you describe these management concepts as successful logistics approaches to a complex system? Why/ Why not?
    OR
    (2) Discuss the application of new supplier management and modified maintenance concepts to the development of F/A-18 aircraft and include the following in your discussion:
    What were the outputs resulting from the logistics considerations?
    How do these new management concepts compare/ contrast to Blanchard’s approach to Logistics Engineering and Management?
    Would you describe these management concepts as successful logistics approaches to a complex system? Why/ Why not?

    C. Henly, Simon, Capt, et al, The Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) PHM and the Autonomic Logistic Concept: Potential Impact on Aging Aircraft Problems, RTO-MP-079(II)
    (1) Discuss the JSF Autonomic Logistic system in relation to the logistic support infrastructure as described by Blanchard. Provide an opinion on this direction in supportability and support.


    D. Easton, Donald R., RADM, Improving the Management of Reliability, Acquisition Research, Graduate School of Business & Public Policy, Naval Postgraduate School
    (1) Discuss what effects inaccurate reliability calculations and predictions may have on a Support System. What can be done to address these inaccuracies during the life-cycle of a system?

    E. Operational Sense and Respond Logistics: Co-evolution of an Adaptive Enterprise Capability, Office of Force Transformation, Department of Defense, United States of America
    (1) Provide an opinion on the concept of Sense and Respond logistics in comparison to traditional logistics support. In particular, compare and contrast Sense and Respond Logistics with supply chain support as described by Blanchard.

    F. Fung, Patrick, et al, Case study: managing for total quality of logistics services in the supply chain, Logistics Information Management Volume 11 Number 5 1998 pp 324-329
    (1) How do the TQM principles described in the Case Study compare to those described in Chapter 1 of Blanchard?
    Discuss what other TQM initiatives the logistics services firm might undertake to maintain or improve on its success.
    Discuss how important you consider TQM to be in relation to Logistics Engineering and Management.

    G. Hall, William P., Managing Maintenance Knowledge in the Context of Large Engineering Projects: Theory and Case Study, Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, Vol. 2, No. 3 (2003) 1-17
    (1) Determine which elements of logistics are related to the “managing maintenance knowledge” issues described in this paper and briefly describe how they contribute to maintenance knowledge.
    Research and briefly describe one other commercially available information system that can be used for the development of maintenance manuals. Provide an overview of how it compares and contrasts to that used in the paper.

    H. Choy, K.L., et al, Development of performance measurement system in managing supplier relationship for maintenance logistics providers, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2007 pp. 352-368
    (1) Research and describe a maintenance logistics information management system that is in use today.
    Provide comment on some of the pros and cons of your chosen system in relation to relevant parts of Blanchard’s Logistics Engineering and Management theories.

    I. HuanNeng Chiu, The integrated logistics management system: a framework and case study, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 25 No. 6, 1995, pp. 4-22
    (1) This paper was written in 1994. Research and describe a newer information technology system that is being used to enable or enhance logistics management and/or integrated logistics systems in “today’s” environment. You do not need to limit your research to the retail sector or Distribution Centres.
    Provide comment on some of the pros and cons of your chosen system in relation to relevant parts of Blanchard’s Logistics Engineering and Management theories.


    Scope:
    This assignment will assess your understanding of the Logistics and Supply Chain Management course topics.

    Length and Presentation:
    Approximately 1500 words

    Criteria by which your assessment will be marked:
    The standards by which the assignment will be assessed include accuracy, interest, structure, clarity and completeness (e.g. referencing, grammar, etc).

    Learning objectives with this assessment (refer to section 2.1): 1, 2, 5, 6


    Assessment 3: Questions with Short Answers – Logistics and Supply Chain Management
    Weighting: 15%
    Due Dates: 18 May 14
    Submission Details: Online through MyUni

    Task:
    Complete the following.
    Using the same business/ system chosen in Assessment 1:
    1. Describe, and rank in importance, the transport modes that are part of this supply chain.

    2. What are the different forms of collaboration that exist in this supply chain?

    3. Describe the key applications of information technology in this supply chain.

    4. Identify and briefly describe one emerging, innovative technology that could benefit this supply chain.

    5. Discuss the role of production operations in the supply chain.

    6. Given its current make-up, to what extent can this supply chain participate in the global economy? Are there changes that could be made to improve its performance in the global market place?
    Assume you are designing and developing a new system.
    7. Provide a brief outline of your new system.

    8. How would you design for:
    a. producibility,
    b. disposability,
    c. quality, and
    d. the environment?
    Include a brief description of each and identify how each is related to supportability.

    Scope:
    This assignment will assess your understanding of the Logistics and Supply Chain Management Closing Intensive course topics.

    Length and Presentation:
    Approximately 1000 words

    Criteria by which your assessment will be marked:
    The standards by which the assignment will be assessed include accuracy, interest, structure, clarity and completeness (e.g. referencing, grammar, etc)

    Learning objectives with this assessment (refer to section 2.1): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6



    Assessment 4: Negotiated Individual Investigation
    Weighting: 40%
    Due Dates: Part 1 – Overview – 29 Apr 14
    Part 2 – Investigation report – 8 Jun 14

    Submission Details:
    This assignment has two parts:
    Part 1 - Verbal three (3) minute overview will be made to the lecturer on the second day of the closing intensive (29 Apr 14).
    Part 2 – Investigation report must be submitted online through MyUni

    Task:
    Discuss what you consider to be the “top 10” key issues/ principles in Logistics and Supply Chain Management and apply to a real world situation.

    Your potential “real world” situation should be discussed with your lecturer during the opening intensive, and formally finalised in the closing intensive following your 3 minute overview. You are to individually undertake an investigation into your selected “real world” situation using all the relevant resources available to you. This investigation will be submitted as a 3000 word report. It is highly recommended that you use the Harvard method of citation and reference list formulation in your submitted work.

    Scope:
    This assignment will assess your understanding of all the components of the course topics

    Length and Presentation:
    Part 1 – Verbal three (3) minute overview
    Part 2 – Investigation report approximately 3000 words

    Criteria by which your assessment will be marked:
    The standards by which the assignment will be assessed include accuracy, interest, structure, clarity and completeness (e.g. referencing, grammar, etc).

    Learning objectives with this assessment (refer to section 2.1): 1-8

    Submission

    No information currently available.

    Course Grading

    Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:

    M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme)
    Grade Mark Description
    FNS   Fail No Submission
    F 1-49 Fail
    P 50-64 Pass
    C 65-74 Credit
    D 75-84 Distinction
    HD 85-100 High Distinction
    CN   Continuing
    NFE   No Formal Examination
    RP   Result Pending

    Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.

    Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.

    Final results for this course will be made available through Access Adelaide.

  • Student Feedback

    The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.

    SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.

  • Student Support
  • Policies & Guidelines
  • Fraud Awareness

    Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student’s disciplinary procedures.

The University of Adelaide is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The University of Adelaide therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.