| The University of Adelaide | Home | Faculties & Divisions | Search |
![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Ms Robyn Mills (email)
Media and Communications Officer The University of Adelaide Business: +61 8 8313 6341 Mobile: +61 410 689 084
|
Thursday, 14 March 2013 Should we halve our meat consumption for the health of our population and the world's environment? That's the question being debated by scientists at the next Debate @ The Waite on Thursday 21 March held by the University of Adelaide's Waite Research Institute. Australia is among the top meat-consuming nations of the world, eating on average almost 108kg of meat annually per person, compared to Britain at 84kg, China 58kg and India at 4.4kg. In Australia, methane emissions are estimated to account for 10% of Australia's total greenhouse gas emissions. But if we reduced meat consumption, could we produce the large amounts of plant foods to feed us? Could we ever be the nation that says "throw another veggie on the barbie"? At Debate @ The Waite, two teams each of three speakers will debate the issues around meat consumption including: the environmental impact of animal production through methane emissions, fertiliser and water use; chronic health issues associated with a heavy-meat diet; the Aussie cultural identity and the right to choose our own lifestyle; the benefits to Australia's economy; nutritional benefits of meat. The debate question is 'Cutting Australia's meat consumption by half will be better for us and the planet'. The moderator will be Dr Paul Willis, Director, Royal Institution of Australia and the audience will vote to see who wins. Speakers on the affirmative side are:
Speakers on the negative side are:
WHAT: Debate @ The Waite - 'Cutting Australia's meat consumption by half will be better for us and the planet'. |