AGRIBUS 7050B - Research Project in Agribusiness Part 2
North Terrace Campus - Semester 2 - 2017
General Course Information
Course Code AGRIBUS 7050B Course Research Project in Agribusiness Part 2 Coordinating Unit Centre for Global Food and Resources Term Semester 2 Level Postgraduate Coursework Location/s North Terrace Campus Units 12 Contact By supervision Available for Study Abroad and Exchange Y Course Description The purpose of the Research Project is to enable students to analyse real-world food and / or agricultural business problems, issues or strategic opportunities. The assessment of the Research Project will have oral and written components taking into account the students' workload and participation at workshops organised by Global Food Studies. Students have the opportunity to choose between two types of research projects. The first research project option ("Option A") involves investigating a current food industry or agribusiness issue through primary data collection (e.g. conducting a survey) or through analysis of secondary data. This option may require the use of decision-support systems and/or statistical software. Most students conducting Research Projects will belong to this research category. Be aware that some primary data collection will require ethics approval which can be a lengthy exercise and needs to be lodged as soon as possible. The second option ("Option B") involves conducting a case study or analysis of a proposed business venture or problem. Students apply and utilise the appropriate conceptual and theoretical models and skills to address the relevant issue or opportunity the business is facing. Given the diversity of the project types, subject to the supervisor's approval students can present the project report in the form of a traditional academic paper or a formal business report. Whilst the structure of the Research Project Report can be different between projects, students are expected to follow the guidelines and discuss with their supervisors if a modification of the Report structure is needed.
Course Coordinator: Mr Craig Johns
Name: Mr. Craig Johns Email: email@example.com Location: Nexus 10 - Level 5 Phone: 8313 6765 Office Hours: By appointment
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from Course Planner.
Course Learning OutcomesOn successful completion of this course students will be able to:
1 Identify literature relevant to the subject of investigation 2 Source interpret, evaluate and analyse primary and/or secondary data 3 Draw and justify conclusions from this analysis 4 Present research findings and conclusions in an academically appropriate manner
University Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) Deep discipline knowledge
- informed and infused by cutting edge research, scaffolded throughout their program of studies
- acquired from personal interaction with research active educators, from year 1
- accredited or validated against national or international standards (for relevant programs)
1,2,3 Critical thinking and problem solving
- steeped in research methods and rigor
- based on empirical evidence and the scientific approach to knowledge development
- demonstrated through appropriate and relevant assessment
2,3,4 Teamwork and communication skills
- developed from, with, and via the SGDE
- honed through assessment and practice throughout the program of studies
- encouraged and valued in all aspects of learning
4 Career and leadership readiness
- technology savvy
- professional and, where relevant, fully accredited
- forward thinking and well informed
- tested and validated by work based experiences
1,2,3,4 Intercultural and ethical competency
- adept at operating in other cultures
- comfortable with different nationalities and social contexts
- Able to determine and contribute to desirable social outcomes
- demonstrated by study abroad or with an understanding of indigenous knowledges
2,3,4 Self-awareness and emotional intelligence
- a capacity for self-reflection and a willingness to engage in self-appraisal
- open to objective and constructive feedback from supervisors and peers
- able to negotiate difficult social situations, defuse conflict and engage positively in purposeful debate
Recommended Resourcesn/a - this will be discussed further in the workshops. See MyUni Research Project Guidelines document.
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching ModesThe course will involve regular weekly workshops on a range of topics relevant to the proposal writing, research methods, presentations and final report editing components of the course. Students will also be assigned supervisors to help guide them through their research project.
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.Students are expected to attend all 3 Hour workshops unless you have already attended the topic in a previous Semester or need to attend the topic in the following Semester (for example, if you are submitting your report and doing your final presentation at the end of Semester 2 then you need to attend the editing and presentation workshops in Semester 2 not Semester 1.) In addition to the time spent in class there will be fortnightly meetings with your supervisor which will result in at least 72 contact hours and a minimum 240 non-contact hours to study the full 6 unit course.
Learning Activities SummarySee MyUni Research Project guidelines document for the full schedule of weekly workshops and course timelines.
Learning Activity Related Learning Outcomes Lecture/ workshop 1,2,3,4 Student presentations 1,2,3,4
Specific Course Requirementsn/a
The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Assessment SummaryThe supervisor and an examiner (assigned confidentially by the Program Coordinator) will assess the Research Project.
Assessment Task Due Date/Week Weight Learning Outcomes Criteria for Assessment of Research Project Written report Week 13 70% 1,2,3,4 1. Clarity and succinctness of writing and logical structure of Research Project Report (10%)
2. Critical assessment of the existing literature (20%)
3. Appropriateness of methodology used (15%)
4. Level of sophistication displayed in the analysis (25%)<
Final oral presentation Week 13 15% 1,2,3,4 Workload Week 13 15% 1,2,3,4 1. Outline and research proposal (10%)
2. Seminar participation and research project management skills (5%)
Assessment DetailThe below criteria will apply to all students commencing and completing the project in this semester including students who started their projects (part-time) in the previous Semester.
Assessment framework for Research Project of Master of Global Food and Agricultural Business has been developed in accordance with the Research Skill Development (RSD) Framework developed at the University of Adelaide (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/rsd/framework/). In general, students must perform at the minimum as a Level 4 Student.
Assessment criteria and performance sheet:
Assessment criteria Very good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory (i) Written report Clarity and
writing and logical structure
of Research Project
In addition, to the criteria in Satisfactory, use appropriate language and genre to extend the knowledge of a range of audiences. Use concise, fluent, well-constructed and carefully proof-read language suitable for academic work. Tables
and Figures are properly designed. Follow required format and
Language is not well-developed or suitable for an academic paper due to grammatical errors, incoherence, etc. Tables
and Figures do not provide additional information to the main text.
Critical assessment of
the existing literature
Collect and record self-determined information/data from self-selected resources, and critically review the
collected information to independently identify knowledge gaps.
Collect and record self-determined information/data from self-selected resources, and summarise
knowledge gaps stated by others.
Collect and record required information/data from a prescribed source. Appropriateness of
Choose and improve an appropriate methodology with self-structured
Choose an appropriate methodology based on structred guidelines. Choose one of several prescribed methodologies. Level of sophistication
displayed in the analysis
Evaluate information/data rigorously
using self-generated criteria based on experience, expertise and literature.
Reflect insightfully to renew others's processes.
Evaluate information/data rigorously using self-determined criteria developed within structured guidelines. Reflect insightfully to refine others' processes. Evaluate information/data using criteria related to the aims of the research project. Replicate others' processes. (ii) Oral presentation Oral presentation In addition to the criteria in Satisfactory,
be able to respond to questions in
effective manner to demonstrate his/her post-research improved set of skills and engage audience to generate new ideas.
Summarise the main content of
his/her Research Project Report in concise and fluent language suitable for academic presentations within a specified time and provide relevant answers to questions being put
Summarise the main content of his/her Research Project Report in ways unsuitable for academic presentations and fail to provide relevant answers to questions being put forward. (iii) Workload Outline and research
In the proposal, background justifies the project in terms of a "gap" or extension
of existing knowledge. The proposal
narrows the research focus effectively
and presents realistic and manageable
research outcomes. The outline shows detailed sections of the final report and logical steps of the analysis that will be developed.
In the proposal, background justifies the project in terms of a "gap" or extension of existing knowledge. The proposal moves from a broader to a more specific context and presents clear research outcomes. The outline shows important sections of the final report and logical steps of the
analysis that will be developed.
Limited background is provided in the proposal. Ideas/arguments are not
well linked at times.
Research questions and/or objectives are given by the supervisor. The outline
shows irrelevant sections
of the final report and implausible steps of the analysis that will be conducted.
In addition to the criteria in Satisfactory, demonstrate an enthusiastic attitude, potential capability and leadership
capacities to manage a relatively
Actively participate at workshops organised by Global Food Studies
and actively seeking guidance and feedback; demonstrate an ability to effectively manage a small research project; effectively take on personal responsability.
Little attempt to actively participate at workshops organised by Global Food Studies, taking no initiative
in managing an independent research project, showing minimum leadership skills including taking on personal responsibility.
SubmissionTwo copies of the Research Project Report must be submitted to the Program Coordinator by the submission date at 12 noon. Any report submitted after the deadline will be considered late. The penalty will be 4 marks out of 100 for every working day which elapses after the submission date.
Students should note that supervisors will be asked to make a report to the examiners including whether s/he has read the final draft and drawing attention to any matters he/she considers relevant to the assessment of the report. Therefore, students are highly recommended to complete their final draft at the latest a week before the closing date to provide time for their supervisors to read the final draft.
Students must also submit a softcopy of the report (in a Word document) to TURNITIN by 12 noon on the submission date. Access to TURNITIN will be made available two weeks prior to the submission date to allow students to check the originality of their work before making a final submission. The details will be provided on MyUni.
Oral presentations will give opportunities for students to receive feedback on their draft report. Each student is expected to give a 10 minute presentation on his or her Research Project. All Global Food and Agricultural Business Masters students and Global Food Studies staff, including examiners, are expected to attend. The students will then be asked to respond to questions put forward by the examiners and audiences. The Program Coordinator and supervisors will make an alternative arrangement for a student unable to attend the
workshop due to an acceptable reason (for example visa restrictions and illness).
The Director of Global Food Studies will present a "Research Project Award" to a student receiving the highest mark for the Research Project. The awardee will receive a certificate and a supporting letter from the Director.
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme) Grade Mark Description FNS Fail No Submission F 1-49 Fail P 50-64 Pass C 65-74 Credit D 75-84 Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction CN Continuing NFE No Formal Examination RP Result Pending
Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Final results for this course will be made available through Access Adelaide.
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and speaking skills
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- International Student Support
- AUU Student Care - Advocacy, confidential counselling, welfare support and advice
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
- Reasonable Adjustments to Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangement Policy
- Academic Honesty Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Elder Conservatorium of Music Noise Management Plan
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student’s disciplinary procedures.
The University of Adelaide is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The University of Adelaide therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.