MECH ENG 4108 - Aircraft Design
North Terrace Campus - Semester 2 - 2017
General Course Information
Course Code MECH ENG 4108 Course Aircraft Design Coordinating Unit School of Mechanical Engineering Term Semester 2 Level Undergraduate Location/s North Terrace Campus Units 3 Contact 4 hours per week Available for Study Abroad and Exchange Y Incompatible MECH ENG 4062 Assumed Knowledge MECH ENG 3101, MECH ENG 3100 Course Description Aircraft design methodology, Technical task preparation, team working, Aircraft design organisation, Aircraft weight calculation, mission fuel weight, Sensitivity analysis, Standard requirements, First estimation of aircraft design parameters, Sizing, Drag polar estimation at low speed, Matching diagram, Aircraft three view and drawings, Overall configuration design, Fuselage design, Propulsion system selection and integration, Wing design considerations, Empennage design considerations, Landing gear design and integration, Weight and balance analysis, Stability and control analysis.
Course Coordinator: Dr Maziar Arjomandi
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from Course Planner.
Course Learning OutcomesOn successful completion of this course students will be able to:
1 To equip students with the required knowledge to conduct conceptual design of different types of aircraft; 2 To make the required decisions during the total design cycle of an aircraft including conceptual, preliminary and detail design; 3 To provide understanding of analysis and assessment of different types of aircraft; 4 To understand the hierarchical models in aircraft design as a multi-disciplinary design objective and utilise a system approach to design and operational performance; 5 To distinguish and understand the design phases of an aircraft; 6 To understand the method of preparation design tasks and technical reports; 7 To be able to calculate total weight and weight fractures of an aircraft; 8 To evaluate and understand sensitivity analysis of design parameters; 9 To perform and understand sizing of an aircraft; 10 To understand layout design of different aircraft;
The above course learning outcomes are aligned with the Engineers Australia Stage 1 Competency Standard for the Professional Engineer.
The course is designed to develop the following Elements of Competency: 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6
University Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) Deep discipline knowledge
- informed and infused by cutting edge research, scaffolded throughout their program of studies
- acquired from personal interaction with research active educators, from year 1
- accredited or validated against national or international standards (for relevant programs)
1-10 Critical thinking and problem solving
- steeped in research methods and rigor
- based on empirical evidence and the scientific approach to knowledge development
- demonstrated through appropriate and relevant assessment
1-10 Teamwork and communication skills
- developed from, with, and via the SGDE
- honed through assessment and practice throughout the program of studies
- encouraged and valued in all aspects of learning
1-10 Career and leadership readiness
- technology savvy
- professional and, where relevant, fully accredited
- forward thinking and well informed
- tested and validated by work based experiences
Course notes – these are essential and required.
J. Roskam, Airplane Design I & II, 2nd Edition, 1989
Jan Roskam, Airplane Design , part III-VIII, 2002
John Anderson, Aircraft Performance and Design, 1999
Darrol Stinton, The Design of the Aeroplane, 2003
Daniel Raymer, Aircraft Design (a conceptual approach),1999
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching Modes
No information currently available.
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.
As per university recommendations, it is expected that students spend 48hrs/week during teaching periods, and that a 3 unit course has a minimum workload of 156 hours regardless of the length of the course. Additional time may need to be spent acquiring assumed knowledge, working on assessment during non-teaching periods, and preparing for and attending examinations.
Learning Activities Summary
1. Introduction and Review – 5%1.1. Course organization and policies1.2. Review of “Aeronautical Engineering I” course1.3. Course and design project topics
2. Weight Estimation – 20%2.1. Weight equation2.2. Aircraft mission diagram2.3. Determination of payload weight
2.4. Determination of mission fuel weight
2.5. Empty weight estimation
3. Sensitivity studies – 10%3.1. Sensitivity of takeoff weight to payload weight3.2. Sensitivity of takeoff weight to empty weight3.3. Sensitivity of takeoff weight to performance parameters
4. Sizing – 30%4.1. Drag polar estimation4.2. Sizing to stall speed requirements4.3. Sizing to takeoff distance requirements
4.4. Sizing to landing distance requirements
4.5. Sizing to climb requirements
4.6. Sizing to manoeuvring requirements
4.7. Matching of all sizing requirements
5. Configuration Design – 35%5.1. Selection of the overall configuration5.2. Method of choosing overall configuration5.3. Design of cockpit and fuselage layout
5.4. Selection and integration of the propulsion system
5.5. Wing planform design
5.6. Empennage sizing
5.7. Control surface sizing
5.8. Landing gear sizing and disposition
5.9. Weight and balance analysis
Specific Course RequirementsNONE
The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Assessment Task Weighting (%) Individual/ Group Formative/ Summative Due (week)* Hurdle criteria Learning outcomes Laboratory (Flight Simulartor Laboratory) 10 Individual Summative Weeks 2-12 attendance 1. 6. 8. 9. 10. Project 20 Group Summative Week 12 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Assignments 10 Individual Summative Weeks 2-12 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Exam 60 Individual Summative Final Exam 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Total 100
This assessment breakdown is registered as an exemption to the University's Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy. The exemption is related to the Procedures clause(s): 1. b. 2.
This course has a hurdle requirement. Meeting the specified hurdle criteria is a requirement for passing the course.
Assessment Related RequirementsNONE
The solutions to the assignments will be reviewed and marked by the course tutor/s according to the marking rubric. The solutions will be available to the students on MyUni after the submission date. The group project will be marked based on 50% group mark and 50% individual contribution using a peer assessment method. The project assessment rubric is presented below:
Section/Criteria Mark (total 100) 1- External design /10 2- Weight calculation /5 3- Matching diagram /10 4- Configuration design /15 5- Drawings /20 6- Format and clarity /15 7- Research activities /10 8- Completeness /15
The hard copy of all assignments must be submitted in the labelled box on level 2 of Engineering South Building. Any assignments submitted as a hard copy must be accompanied by an assessment cover sheet available from room S116 or near the assignment submission area. Late assignments will be penalised 10% per day. Extensions for all assignments will only be given in exceptional circumstances and a case for this with supporting documentation can be made in writing after a lecture or via email to the lecturer who set the assignment. Hard copy assignments will be assessed and returned in 2 weeks of the due date. There will be no opportunities for re-submission of work of unacceptable standard. Due to the large size of the class feedback on assignments will be limited to in-class discussion resulting from questions from students.
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme) Grade Mark Description FNS Fail No Submission F 1-49 Fail P 50-64 Pass C 65-74 Credit D 75-84 Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction CN Continuing NFE No Formal Examination RP Result Pending
Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Final results for this course will be made available through Access Adelaide.
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and speaking skills
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- International Student Support
- AUU Student Care - Advocacy, confidential counselling, welfare support and advice
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
- Reasonable Adjustments to Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangement Policy
- Academic Honesty Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Elder Conservatorium of Music Noise Management Plan
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student’s disciplinary procedures.
The University of Adelaide is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The University of Adelaide therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.