PHIL 2048 - Philosophy of Film

North Terrace Campus - Semester 2 - 2014

This course will critically examine the nature and influence of realism in films, and explore aspects of our cognitive, emotional, and moral engagement with narrative fiction films. Questions about the aesthetic experience afforded by films, the meanings and emotions conveyed by films, and whether moral development or degradation is possible through films will be explored. Reading material will be mostly drawn from the tradition of analytical philosophy of film. The course will also include some film viewing, details of which will be provided at the commencement of the course.

  • General Course Information
    Course Details
    Course Code PHIL 2048
    Course Philosophy of Film
    Coordinating Unit Philosophy
    Term Semester 2
    Level Undergraduate
    Location/s North Terrace Campus
    Units 3
    Contact Up to 3 hours per week
    Prerequisites At least 12 units of undergraduate study
    Assessment Discussion paper 1,000 words (20%), group activity 650 words (15%), essay 1,000 words (35%), exam 1,200 words (30%).
    Course Staff

    Course Coordinator: Dr Denise Gamble

    Lectures and tutorials: Dr. Denise Gamble
    Course Timetable

    The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from Course Planner.

    Lecture-Seminar 2-4 Wednesday
  • Learning Outcomes
    Course Learning Outcomes



    · LO 1 Ability to engage critically with films and analytical theories of film and film experience especially in relation to moral experience



    · LO 2 Understanding of the pervasive role of films in contemporary society and the bases and moral implications of it



    · LO 3 Capacity to think rigorously about identified issues in morality and art in relation to film



    · LO 4 Ability to prepare and deliver coherently and logically argued written material



    · LO 5 Ability to critically evaluate their own and others’ written materials



    · LO 6 Ability to engage productively and respectfully with their peers



    · LO 7 Ability to confidently, critically, and knowledgeably engage with philosophical writing on film and with unfamiliar films in future
    University Graduate Attributes

    This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:

    University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s)
    Knowledge and understanding of the content and techniques of a chosen discipline at advanced levels that are internationally recognised. 1, 3
    The ability to locate, analyse, evaluate and synthesise information from a wide variety of sources in a planned and timely manner. 3, 4
    An ability to apply effective, creative and innovative solutions, both independently and cooperatively, to current and future problems. 4, 5,
    Skills of a high order in interpersonal understanding, teamwork and communication. 5,
    A proficiency in the appropriate use of contemporary technologies. 5, 6
    A commitment to continuous learning and the capacity to maintain intellectual curiosity throughout life. 7,
    A commitment to the highest standards of professional endeavour and the ability to take a leadership role in the community. 6
    An awareness of ethical, social and cultural issues within a global context and their importance in the exercise of professional skills and responsibilities. 2,
  • Learning Resources
    Required Resources


     1. Aesthetics and Film. Katherine Thomson-Jones. New York: Continuum Publishing. 2008


    2. Articles or book chapters posted as PDFs on MyUni. 


    3  Required film list at BSL Reserve & Multi-media section of library and available on MyUni.

     





    Recommended Resources

    David Bordwell & Noël Carroll (eds.) (1996) Post-theory. Restructuring film studies. Univ. of Wisconsin Press.
    Noël Carroll (1998) A philosophy of mass art. Clarendon Press Oxford.
    Paisley Livingston & Carl Plantinga. (2009) The Routledge Companion to philosophy and film. London & New York: Routledge


     Websites http://www.film-philosophy.com/index.php/f-p http://cinetext.philo.at/ http://www.bedfordstmartins.com/phillips-film http://www.filmphilosophy.com/ http://www.blogcatalog.com/topic/Philosophy+of+Film/

    Online Learning



    Online/e-Experience:
     

     
    Lecture recordings
     
     
    Film viewing
     
     
    MyUni assignment upload and return
     
     
    Readings links
     
     
    Grading rubrics
     
     
    Lecture slides
     
     
    Tutorial questions
     
     
    Email
  • Learning & Teaching Activities
    Learning & Teaching Modes

    The 2-hour timeslot will be used flexibly. Topics will be introduced by means of PowerPoint lecture slides. Opportunity for collaborative small group student activity will be included in each session. The construction and maintenance of Wikis will be undertaken at group level. Some sessions will include periods of film viewing.



    Students are expected to prepare for separate tutorials by reading the material set for the topic each week.
    Workload

    The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.


    WORKLOAD



    The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.

     
     
    1 x 2 hour lecture-seminar per week (x 12)

    24hours
     
     
    1 x 3 hours reading per week (x 12)

    36 hours
     
     
    1 x 3 hours research per week (x 12)

    36 hours
     
     
    1 x 3 hours tutorial assignment preparation each week (x 12)

    36 hours
     

     
     
    Total = 144
    Learning Activities Summary
    Part 1: Aesthetic experience

    The medium – formative and realist tendencies
    Formativist tendencies
    Realist tendencies – poetic realism
    Documentary. Cinéma Véritaté
    British social realism
    Italian neo-realism
    Iranian neo-realism


    Part 2: Engaging with film

    Film and the emotions
    Empathy, realism, and character identification
    Bordwell on the emotional pre-structuring of film
    Moral education through film experience: realism vs anti-realism
    Narrative desires and morality
    Morality and horror film









     

    Small Group Discovery Experience
    Wikis will be developed for assessment during course where students will work collaboratively in groups of 2 or 3 on a set topic.
  • Assessment

    The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:

    1. Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
    2. Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
    3. Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
    4. Assessment must maintain academic standards.

    Assessment Summary
    Assessment Task 1 – Discussion paper
    Analyse and critically evaluate item selected by course convenor (a journal article)
    Summative and criterion based 20%
     
     
    Assessment Task 2 –Wikis
    Group activity of creating and maintaining a Wiki: to select a film representative of film realism, identify the film’s moral themes or problems, identify and evaluate cinematic methods relevant to communication of the identified themes.
    Summative, Formative, Collaborative  15%
     
     
    Assessment Task 3 - Essay
    Write an essay on a topic set by course convenor.
    [That will evaluate and apply critical analyses and produce a coherently argued, logical and well substantiated piece of written work]
    Summative and criterion based  35%
     

    Assessment Task 4 –Exam
    Final closed-book written examination 
    Summative and criterion based  30%






    Assessment Related Requirements

    Attendance and prepared participation at a weekly tutorial.

    Attendance at lecture-seminar each week.

    Group activity in relation to Wiki.

    Some film viewing.

    Attempt on all assessment items to complete course.
    Assessment Detail



    Discussion paper of 1000 words 

    Critical analysis of an argument in an article chosen from several provided.



    Essay

     1800 word essay chosen from a list of topics to be provided



    Group Activity

     Participate as member of a group in composing and using Wikis (650 words per student)



    Two-Hour Closed-book Examination

    Write two essay-type answers chosen from a set of six questions that address key components of the course. Questions will fall into two parts: Part A and Part B. There will be three questions in each part. Choose one question from each part. (About 600 words per answer)

    Submission

    All written work apart from that in the examination will be uploaded electronically into Assignments on MyUni. Submitted work will be marked electronically and returned electronically via Assignments on MyUni.
    Course Grading

    Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:

    M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme)
    Grade Mark Description
    FNS   Fail No Submission
    F 1-49 Fail
    P 50-64 Pass
    C 65-74 Credit
    D 75-84 Distinction
    HD 85-100 High Distinction
    CN   Continuing
    NFE   No Formal Examination
    RP   Result Pending

    Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.

    Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.


    The Grading Basis used for this course is: MS6

    Details of the grades/results available in this Grading Basis can be obtained from: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/dvca/grading/



    Grade Descriptors are available (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/701/) which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level.



    Final results for this course will be made available through Access Adelaide.

    Final results for this course will be made available through Access Adelaide.

  • Student Feedback

    The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.

    SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.

  • Student Support
  • Policies & Guidelines
  • Fraud Awareness

    Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student’s disciplinary procedures.

The University of Adelaide is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The University of Adelaide therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.