PLANT SC 7255WT - Principles and Practice of GM Crop Regulation
Waite Campus - Semester 2 - 2015
General Course Information
Course Code PLANT SC 7255WT Course Principles and Practice of GM Crop Regulation Coordinating Unit School of Agriculture, Food and Wine Term Semester 2 Level Postgraduate Coursework Location/s Waite Campus Units 3 Contact Up to 15 hours per week for 3 weeks Available for Study Abroad and Exchange Y Assumed Knowledge PLANT SC 7225WT Course Description Plant biotechnology is widely viewed as a key tool in ensuring world food security. However, throughout the world, the use and access of the technology is subject to strict legislative restrictions and regulatory oversight. This course will help the students develop an understanding of the of principles and approaches used by GM crop regulators in assembling appropriate data and understanding of a particular event to allow for regulatory decision-making. The early part of the course will focus on developing the skills and approaches necessary to identify the protection goals, assessment endpoints and develop risk hypotheses needed to frame a risk assessment for a particular event in a named national territory. The course will next consider the types of information needed to compile effective environmental and health risk assessments. Finally, the students will engage in `role-play team activities in which one team will act as notifier whilst the other will take the role of regulator. Interaction between parties will mimic the notification process in a named national territory. The primary intended learning outcomes are to develop the required skills and understanding to progress a product through the regulatory process to market.
No information currently available.
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from Course Planner.
Course Learning OutcomesSuccessful students will be able to:
1 1. Determine the identity of the principle protection goals, associated assessment endpoints and risk hypotheses that are relevant to a national framework by reference to the characteristics of a specific GM event and other appropriate information. 2 Understand the main elements of an effective risk assessment for regulatory decision-making. 3 Understand the scientific principles underpinning the regulation of GM crops 4 Critically evaluate data needs to test risk hypotheses 5 Apply their knowledge to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the case for commercial release by reference to information contained in a dossier 6 Effectively communicate the needs for additional pertinent data to allow the testing of risk hypotheses (from a regulatory perspective) and to address such requests with maximum efficacy (from a notifier perspective)
University Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) Knowledge and understanding of the content and techniques of a chosen discipline at advanced levels that are internationally recognised. 1,2,3,4 The ability to locate, analyse, evaluate and synthesise information from a wide variety of sources in a planned and timely manner. 4,5 An ability to apply effective, creative and innovative solutions, both independently and cooperatively, to current and future problems. 5,6 Skills of a high order in interpersonal understanding, teamwork and communication. 5,6 A proficiency in the appropriate use of contemporary technologies. 3,4 A commitment to continuous learning and the capacity to maintain intellectual curiosity throughout life. 3,4 A commitment to the highest standards of professional endeavour and the ability to take a leadership role in the community. 5,6 An awareness of ethical, social and cultural issues within a global context and their importance in the exercise of professional skills and responsibilities. 6
Required ResourcesThis course will require the following texts and other resources:
ICGEB collection of Biosafety reviews
Online LearningOn-line resources (BCH, web sites of national competent authorities, OECD website, ICGEB).
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching ModesThis course will be delivered by the following means:
5 lectures of 1 hour each per week
2 class exercise (6h per week total)
2 tutorials of 2h per week
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.This course will require approximately 156 hours comprising scheduled contact time, and private study.
Learning Activities SummaryThe course content will include the following:
Week 1 Defining the risk environment:
• Problem formulation with reference to case studies
• Strategies for the identification of protection goals, assessment endpoints and setting risk hypotheses
• Approaches to measure fitness, weediness and invasiveness to test risk hypotheses
• Interpreting plant characterisation data
• Targeting the useful elements of generic data on biodiversity to test risk hypothese
• Dossier case studies (interpreting different forms and formats of data wrt testing risk specific risk hypotheses)
• Setting risk hypotheses from archive dossiers
Week 2 Principles of Risk Analysis:
• Building an Environmental Risk Assessment 1
• Building an Environmental Risk Assessment 2
• Building a Risk Assessment for human and animal health
• Risk Communication: when to ask for more information
• Dossier case studies
• Gap analysis: Identifying what data is missing (time-limited formative exercise)
• Introduction to the dossier to be used in the individual assignment
Week 3 Implementation:
• Limits and strengths of Tiered risk assessment (2)
• Limits and strengths of data from confined field trials (2)
• Limits and strengths of molecular characterisation (1)
• Team meetings for assignment: guidance through the building of mini-dossiers and notifier-regulator communication
• Team assignment meetings and assessment
The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Assessment Task Task Type Weighting Learning Outcome Test Summative 35% 1,2,3,4 Individual Assignment Formative & Summative 30% 1,3,4,5 Group Assignment (presentation) Formative & Summative 10% 1,2,3,4,5 Group Assignment (Communication report) Summative 10% 1,2,3,4,5,6 Individual final report of Group Work Summative 15% 1,2,3,4,5,6
Assessment DetailTests: (35% of total course grade). A written summative test (short answer questions and short essays) will be given during a dedicated tutorial session to address understanding of the principles of problem formulation, methods leading to the identification of protection goals and assessment endpoints and of how to formulate and test a risk hypothesis by reference to case studies.
Individual assignment: (30% of total course grade). Written evaluation of a case study dossier in the context of its proposed release into a named new national territory. Students will be expected to use e-resources, the hard literature and the dossier to identify information within the dossier that applies to the risk hypotheses that they have built and to determine whether there are valid grounds to request additional information from the notifier (if so, in what form). In this way, they will demonstrate a working practical understanding of the technology, the legal context and the principles underlying regulatory oversight.
This will take the form of teams adopting the role of notifiers or regulators. Both teams will be given basic characterisation data relating to an event that is proposed for release in a named territory. The notifier group will first compile a mini dossier covering a defined section of a full dossier (e.g non-target organisms). During this time, the regulator group will use the same data to compile risk hypotheses relevant to the national priorities of the receiving nation. Each team will then make an oral presentation (formative task) of their findings.
Communication Report 10%
The regulators will make a written request for more information of the notifiers (report 500 words) to which the notifiers will respond with a report response (500 words) that describes data from the literature or new (hypothetical) results (the aim will be to minimise the use of expensive or protracted experiments).
Individual Final Report 15%.
Each individual in the group will compile a final report outlining whether/why the data presented in the notifier response warrants full release, request for more data, risk management or rejection (1000 words)
If an extension is not applied for, or not granted then a penalty for late submission will apply. A penalty of 10% of the value of the assignment for each calendar day that the assignment is late (i.e. weekends count as 2 days), up to a maximum of 50% of the available marks will be applied. This means that an assignment that is 5 days late or more without an approved extension can only receive a maximum of 50% of the marks available for that assignment.
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme) Grade Mark Description FNS Fail No Submission F 1-49 Fail P 50-64 Pass C 65-74 Credit D 75-84 Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction CN Continuing NFE No Formal Examination RP Result Pending
Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Final results for this course will be made available through Access Adelaide.
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and speaking skills
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- International Student Support
- AUU Student Care - Advocacy, confidential counselling, welfare support and advice
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
- Reasonable Adjustments to Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangement Policy
- Academic Honesty Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Elder Conservatorium of Music Noise Management Plan
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student’s disciplinary procedures.
The University of Adelaide is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The University of Adelaide therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.