COMP SCI 2008 - Topics in Computer Science
North Terrace Campus - Semester 2 - 2020
General Course Information
Course Code COMP SCI 2008 Course Topics in Computer Science Coordinating Unit School of Computer Science Term Semester 2 Level Undergraduate Location/s North Terrace Campus Units 6 Available for Study Abroad and Exchange N Prerequisites COMP SCI 1104 Corequisites COMP SCI 1103 or COMP SCI 2103 Restrictions Only available to students enrolled in B. Computer Science (Advanced) Course Description Introduction to a specialised area of Computer Science. Topics include theoretical and applied aspects of Computer Science. Combines guided reading and research with a significant individual or group project component.
Course Coordinator: Associate Professor Markus Wagner
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from Course Planner.
Course Learning OutcomesOn successful completion of this course students will be able to:
1 Develop skills in independent project work and research 2 Acquire knowledge in a selected area of contemporary computer science 3 Improve communication skills in reporting findings of the study
The above course learning outcomes are aligned with the Engineers Australia Stage 1 Competency Standard for the Professional Engineer.
The course is designed to develop the following Elements of Competency: 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6
University Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) Deep discipline knowledge
- informed and infused by cutting edge research, scaffolded throughout their program of studies
- acquired from personal interaction with research active educators, from year 1
- accredited or validated against national or international standards (for relevant programs)
2 Critical thinking and problem solving
- steeped in research methods and rigor
- based on empirical evidence and the scientific approach to knowledge development
- demonstrated through appropriate and relevant assessment
1 Teamwork and communication skills
- developed from, with, and via the SGDE
- honed through assessment and practice throughout the program of studies
- encouraged and valued in all aspects of learning
3 Career and leadership readiness
- technology savvy
- professional and, where relevant, fully accredited
- forward thinking and well informed
- tested and validated by work based experiences
1 Intercultural and ethical competency
- adept at operating in other cultures
- comfortable with different nationalities and social contexts
- able to determine and contribute to desirable social outcomes
- demonstrated by study abroad or with an understanding of indigenous knowledges
3 Self-awareness and emotional intelligence
- a capacity for self-reflection and a willingness to engage in self-appraisal
- open to objective and constructive feedback from supervisors and peers
- able to negotiate difficult social situations, defuse conflict and engage positively in purposeful debate
Required ResourcesMay vary with topic but generally access to internet and computer.
Online LearningWill require contact with project mentor/supervisor, and formal presentation of work, but otherwise could all be done online.
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching ModesIn this course, the student will meet regularly with the project supervisor, and once a week meet with the course coordinator to discuss the progress of the project.
This course aims to introduce students to a range of fundamental research and project development skills. The course will be taught through a combination of meetings with the course supervisor and the project supervisor.
The meetings with the course coordinator are to assess the weekly progress of the project and discuss the expected outcomes. During these meetings, the student will make an informal presentation that will be assessed by the course coordinator. The meetings with the project supervisor are to discuss the details of the development of the project.
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.Students are expected to spend 20 hours per six unit course. This includes approximately 2 hours of contact time per week (one hour with the project supervisor and one hour with the course coordinator), and approximately 18 hours of independent study time.
Learning Activities Summary
week topic lecturer presentation written project and system 1 Introduction and supervisor matching GC 2 Problem identification GC Presentation 1 3 Literature review GC Presentation 2 4 Literature review GC Presentation 3 5 Research hypothesis GC Presentation 4 6 Specification and design of project GC Presentation 5 7 Specification and design of project GC Presentation 6 8 Hypothesis testing and experiments GC Presentation 7 9 Hypothesis testing and experiments GC Presentation 8 10 Hypothesis testing and experiments GC Presentation 9 11 Results communication GC Presentation 10 12 Results communication GC Poster and demo presentation
to the School of Computer Science
Submission of project and system
The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Assessment Task Weighting (%) Individual/ Group Formative/ Summative Due (week)* Hurdle criteria Learning outcomes CBOK Alignment** Project Paper 30 Individual Formative / Summative Week 13 Min 40% 1. 2. 3. 1.1 1.2 2.4 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 System 20 Individual Formative Week 13 1. 2. 3. 1.1 1.2 2.4 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 Poster and demo presentation 20 Individual Summative Week 13 1. 2. 3. 1.1 1.2 2.4 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 Mid-term Presentations 20 Individual Summative Weeks 2-12 Min 40% 1. 2. 3. 1.1 1.2 2.4 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 Introduction and Literature Review Paper 10 Individual Summative Week 6 1. 2. 3. 1.1 1.2 2.4 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 Total 100
This assessment breakdown complies with the University's Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy.
This course has a hurdle requirement. Meeting the specified hurdle criteria is a requirement for passing the course.
**CBOK is the Core Body of Knowledge for ICT Professionals defined by the Australian Computer Society. The alignment in the table above corresponds with the following CBOK Areas:
1. Problem Solving1.1 Abstraction1.2 Design
2. Professional Knowledge2.1 Ethics2.2 Professional expectations2.3 Teamwork concepts & issues2.4 Interpersonal communications2.5 Societal issues2.6 Understanding of ICT profession
3. Technology resources3.1 Hardware & Software3.2 Data & information3.3 Networking
4. Technology Building4.1 Programming4.2 Human factors4.3 Systems development4.4 Systems acquisition
5. ICT Management5.1 IT governance & organisational5.2 IT project management5.3 Service management5.4 Security management
Assessment Related RequirementsStudents must obtain at least 40% in the written project and mid-term presentations components, and 50% overall, to pass the course.
Assessment DetailWritten report: this will be a 6-8 page conference format paper. This paper will ideally be at a stage that can potentially be submitted to a conference of reasonable reputation.
System: this will typically consist of a program showing the development of the project and experiments.
Poster and demo: intended to be used as a conference style presentation, where the audience will be the faculty and students of the School of Computer Science.
Mid-term Presentations: 10 minute presentation showing the fortnightly progress of the student.
Assessment Type Proportion of that
Due Week Learning
CBOK Mappping* Problem Solving
(abstraction and design)
(data and information)
(programming, HCI, system
Mid-term present.1 Formative
4% week3 1,2,3 5 5 5 5 Mid-term present.2 Formative
4% week5 1,2,3 5 5 5 5 Mid-term present.3 Formative
4% week7 1,2,3 5 5 5 5 Mid-term present.4 Formative
4% week9 1,2,3 5 5 5 5 Mid-term present.5 Formative
4% week11 1,2,3 5 5 5 5 Written report Formative
30% week12 1,2,3 5 5 5 5 System Formative
30% week12 1,2,3 5 3 5 5 Poster present. Formative
20% week12 1,2,3 5 5 5 5
SubmissionWritten projects and system will be submitted online, please refer to each assignment description for details.
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme) Grade Mark Description FNS Fail No Submission F 1-49 Fail P 50-64 Pass C 65-74 Credit D 75-84 Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction CN Continuing NFE No Formal Examination RP Result Pending
Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Final results for this course will be made available through Access Adelaide.
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and speaking skills
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- International Student Support
- AUU Student Care - Advocacy, confidential counselling, welfare support and advice
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
- Reasonable Adjustments to Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
- LinkedIn Learning
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangement Policy
- Academic Honesty Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Elder Conservatorium of Music Noise Management Plan
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student’s disciplinary procedures.
The University of Adelaide is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The University of Adelaide therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.