PSYCHOL 4200B - Honours Thesis in Psychology: Part 2
North Terrace Campus - Semester 2 - 2017
General Course Information
Course Code PSYCHOL 4200B Course Honours Thesis in Psychology: Part 2 Coordinating Unit Psychology Term Semester 2 Level Undergraduate Location/s North Terrace Campus Units 12 Contact 4 x 2 hour seminars Available for Study Abroad and Exchange N Prerequisites PSYCHOL 4201 Assumed Knowledge PSYCHOL 3020 or equivalent Restrictions Available to students in the BPsychSc (Honours) and Honours year of BPsych(Hons) Course Description This component encompasses the write-up of the thesis, including the preparation of a full literature review, data analysis, reporting of results and thesis submission. A small number of information seminars will be held to assist students with their thesis writing and to plan out future course-work applications.
Course Coordinator: Associate Professor Carolyn SemmlerSchool of Psychology Office: firstname.lastname@example.org; ph +61 8313 5693
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from Course Planner.
Students will attend 6 Research seminars designed to introduce the research process and develop the
skills necessary for successful completion of the research project component:
The seminars are held on Monday afternoons and we treat attendance at the seminars as an important component of the assessment and development of students. Attendance at 75% of the seminars for the full seminar time is a requirement
and the thesis will not be marked if this requirement is not met.
An attendance sheet will be circulated during each seminar to keep a record and non-attendance is only accepted under exceptional circumstances (illness, deaths in the family, serious accidents). Seminar attendance also requires professional behaviour and apologies should be submitted prior to the seminar if students cannot attend.
Course Learning Outcomes1. Demonstrated original and useful contribution to psychological knowledge;
2. Mastery of the content psychology areas across the discipline
3. Ability to develop clear arguments that justify the research aims and cogently discuss the extent to which the aims have been borne out in the findings of the research thesis;
4. Deep understanding of sound research methodology in psychology
5. The ability to apply appropriate quantitative and/or qualitative data analysis; and
6. A critical awareness of the implications of the findings as well as the strengths and limitations of the research thesis.
University Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) Deep discipline knowledge
- informed and infused by cutting edge research, scaffolded throughout their program of studies
- acquired from personal interaction with research active educators, from year 1
- accredited or validated against national or international standards (for relevant programs)
1,2,3,4,5 & 6 Critical thinking and problem solving
- steeped in research methods and rigor
- based on empirical evidence and the scientific approach to knowledge development
- demonstrated through appropriate and relevant assessment
2,3,4,5,&6 Teamwork and communication skills
- developed from, with, and via the SGDE
- honed through assessment and practice throughout the program of studies
- encouraged and valued in all aspects of learning
1,6 Career and leadership readiness
- technology savvy
- professional and, where relevant, fully accredited
- forward thinking and well informed
- tested and validated by work based experiences
2,3,4 Intercultural and ethical competency
- adept at operating in other cultures
- comfortable with different nationalities and social contexts
- able to determine and contribute to desirable social outcomes
- demonstrated by study abroad or with an understanding of indigenous knowledges
1,6 Self-awareness and emotional intelligence
- a capacity for self-reflection and a willingness to engage in self-appraisal
- open to objective and constructive feedback from supervisors and peers
- able to negotiate difficult social situations, defuse conflict and engage positively in purposeful debate
The required resources in Honours are defined by supervisors of the research thesis.
Students will be introduced to key resources required to complete their research thesis within the school including;
Research Participation Pool
Ethics Committee and Sub-Committee
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching ModesThe seminars in semester 2 are held in weeks 1-6 and are 2 hours in duration (depending on the topic and amount of interaction).
All other course content is placed online.
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.
Please note that workload is across 1 year for thesis components
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course
Lectures: 6 x 2 hours = 12 hours
Ethics Application & Proposal: 20 hours
Research Presentation preparation: 30 hours
Independent research: 65 hours
Final submission: 3 hours
Supervision Meetings: 26 hours
Learning Activities SummarySeminars require students to bring along drafts of the components of the thesis for workshops and interactive feedback
Seminar 1: Abstract and Introduction
Seminar 2: Method
Seminar 3: Results and Figures
Seminar 4: Discussion
Seminar 5: Thesis submission & Assessment procedures
Seminar 6: Life after thesis: Postgraduate pathways to professional practice and research careers
The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Assessment SummaryThe thesis represented 50% of the weighting for the final Honours result (and 100% of the assessment within the PSYCHOL 4200A/B course).
It assesses all Learning Outcomes in the course and represents a substantial piece of independent research work carried out under supervision.
Assessment DetailResearch Thesis Requirement
The School offers opportunity for both quantitative and qualitative research without bias and across a wide range of topics. Our concern is that the methodology and report should be appropriate for the nature of the research. Given that quantitative and qualitative research have different conventions, the following should be read with care:
The Australian Psychological Society Course Accreditation Guidelines for Fourth Year courses (June 2010) stipulates a research project with the following requirements:
1.1.11 The research project must include an individual research question, individual intensive empirical literature review, individual data analysis, individual reporting of results and discussion, but may involve shared data collection. The research project should be structured so that students participate in all of the steps involved in research including the formulation of research questions, the design of the study including selection of appropriate methodology, the collection and analysis of data to test the
research question, the interpretation of the findings and the writing up of the report. The research question being pursued should be psychological in nature.
4.1.12 The research question being pursued must address issues specifically relevant to the field of psychology.
4.1.13 The research project may be supervised either solely or jointly, but in all cases at least one supervisor must be a member of the academic staff from the Psychology AOU.
4.1.14 The research project should be written up, adhering to APA format, and presented as a report for assessment. The report should include a substantial literature review and may take the final form of a traditional thesis, or a literature review accompanied by a report of the research presented in the format of a peer-reviewed scientific journal article.
4.1.15 The total length of the text of the written research report should be between 9000 and 15000 words. Data collected for the research project must be available for inspection by APAC on request.
At the University of Adelaide: The thesis is required to be of a minimum length of 12,000 words and a maximum length of 12,000 words NOT INCLUDING the declaration, acknowledgements, title page, table of contents, in-text tables, in-test figures, title of tables and figures, references in the Reference section and the appendicies (which are NOT marked by the examiner and are simply there to clarify any in-text materials). The word count INCLUDES the Abstract (which shall not exceed 200 words), Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion, in-text citations, quotes and references, and in-text statistics.
The length of the thesis SHALL NOT exceed 12,000 words and this should be seen as the absolute maximum, NOT A GOAL. Theses that exceed the upper limit will be returned to students for reduction and the usual late penalties will apply during the time it takes to edit the thesis down to 12,000 words.
The presentation of the thesis must adhere to APA (Publication Manual of American Psychological Association, 6th Edn.) format for
an Empirical Study as per Chapter 2 of the APA manual and a copy of the APA guide is available from the school office for use by Honours students. Some theses (ie., qualitative or discourse analytic theses) will not fit into this format and as such an non-empirical thesis format should be used. An example thesis (empirical and non-empirical) is provided in Appendix of the
honours thesis information guide and the format for presentation should adhere to this structure. The additional pages (front matter) are outlined for student during the thesis writing workshops in semester 2. Theses submitted in previous years are available for inspection by contacting the School of Psychology Office.
Theses will be stored electronically in the Digital Thesis Repository of the Barr Smith Library. Those theses successfully submitted for publication may be eligible for an award (please see the School of Psychology home page for details).
Honours Thesis Criteria
An outstanding thesis in Honours Psychology should reflect all of the following qualities. It should demonstrate:
(a) originality and/or a useful contribution to psychological knowledge;
(b) mastery of the content area;
(c) the ability to develop clear arguments that justify the research aims and cogently discuss the extent to which the aims have been borne out in the findings;
(d) clarity and quality of written expression including appropriate figures and tables;
(e) a sound research methodology;
(f) the ability to apply appropriate quantitative and/or qualitative data analysis;
(g) a critical awareness of the implications of the findings as well as the strengths and limitations of the study.
Further details regarding the assessment criteria and assessment process for theses can be obtained from the Psychology Honours handbook.
SubmissionThe submission of the thesis is electronic and will be outlined in week 5 of the seminar series. Submission of data, consent forms and return of equipment to the School must concurrently with the submission of the thesis. Please refer to the Psychology Honours Handbook for details.
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme) Grade Mark Description FNS Fail No Submission F 1-49 Fail P 50-64 Pass C 65-74 Credit D 75-84 Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction CN Continuing NFE No Formal Examination RP Result Pending
Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Final results for this course will be made available through Access Adelaide.
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and speaking skills
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- International Student Support
- AUU Student Care - Advocacy, confidential counselling, welfare support and advice
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
- Reasonable Adjustments to Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
- LinkedIn Learning
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangement Policy
- Academic Honesty Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Elder Conservatorium of Music Noise Management Plan
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student’s disciplinary procedures.
The University of Adelaide is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The University of Adelaide therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.