COMP SCI 2204 - Advanced Programming Paradigms
North Terrace Campus - Semester 2 - 2017
General Course Information
Course Code COMP SCI 2204 Course Advanced Programming Paradigms Coordinating Unit School of Computer Science Term Semester 2 Level Undergraduate Location/s North Terrace Campus Units 3 Contact 3 hours per week Available for Study Abroad and Exchange Y Prerequisites One of COMP SCI 1007, COMP SCI 1009, COMP SCI 1103, COMP SCI 1203, COMP SCI 2103 or COMP SCI 2202 Course Description A selection of topics from the following: Fundamental models of computation, illustrated by the lambda calculus. Different approaches to programming: functional and logic paradigms. Fundamental concepts of programming languages, including abstraction, binding, parameter passing, scope, control abstractions. Programming models expressed via Scheme: substitution model; map/reduce programming; environment model; object oriented model; a compositional programming model. Examples in application: map/reduce programming in Google and with Hadoop; flow-oriented programming for composition of web-services. Cloud computing platforms and programming models.
Course Coordinator: Dr Andrew Wendelborn
The lecturer for Advanced Programming Paradigms in Semester 2, 2017 is:
Dr Andrew Wendelborn
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from Course Planner.
Course Learning OutcomesOn successful completion of this course students will be able to:
1 The nature of functional programming 2 Relationships between functional, imperative, object oriented and logic programming 3 An understanding of programming language syntax, semantics and interpretation 4 How the functional paradigm supports data science and parallel computing 5 The use of functional programming in practice 6 Independently find and interpret discipline related documentation 7 Clear communication of programming solutions, and of their derivation 8 An ability to solve new problems.
The above course learning outcomes are aligned with the Engineers Australia Stage 1 Competency Standard for the Professional Engineer.
The course is designed to develop the following Elements of Competency: 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6
University Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) Deep discipline knowledge
- informed and infused by cutting edge research, scaffolded throughout their program of studies
- acquired from personal interaction with research active educators, from year 1
- accredited or validated against national or international standards (for relevant programs)
1-5, 8 Critical thinking and problem solving
- steeped in research methods and rigor
- based on empirical evidence and the scientific approach to knowledge development
- demonstrated through appropriate and relevant assessment
1-4, 8 Teamwork and communication skills
- developed from, with, and via the SGDE
- honed through assessment and practice throughout the program of studies
- encouraged and valued in all aspects of learning
5, 7, 8 Career and leadership readiness
- technology savvy
- professional and, where relevant, fully accredited
- forward thinking and well informed
- tested and validated by work based experiences
5-8 Intercultural and ethical competency
- adept at operating in other cultures
- comfortable with different nationalities and social contexts
- Able to determine and contribute to desirable social outcomes
- demonstrated by study abroad or with an understanding of indigenous knowledges
6, 8 Self-awareness and emotional intelligence
- a capacity for self-reflection and a willingness to engage in self-appraisal
- open to objective and constructive feedback from supervisors and peers
- able to negotiate difficult social situations, defuse conflict and engage positively in purposeful debate
Required ResourcesThere is one textbook for this course.
This text applies only to the functional programming section of the course.
Abelson, H. and Sussman,G.J with Sussman, J., Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs, 2nd Ed. (MITPress,1996).
The textbook is available (in html format) at: http://mitpress.mit.edu/sicp/full-text/book/book.html . However, the printed edition, though it has the same content, is more convenient to use.
Recommended ResourcesSee above.
Online LearningThe course will use Canvas and Echo 360 for various activities, especially discussion forums.
Details will be provided in lectures.
All general questions relating to the course and its content should be posted to the course forum. Any changes to assignment requirements will be posted to this forum. Students are expected to check the forum regularly for announcements relating to the course.
All course materials including lecture slides, course notes, assignment descriptions and tutorials, will be available on the course website.
IMPORTANT: we will provide online, in advance, material for the next lectures.
We want you to review this prior to lectures.
These will be primarily videos, as well as readings and problems from the textbook.
We expect you to have worked through the posted materials before the lectures. During the lectures, we will review selected aspects, ask questions about the material, and discuss these in class. Come prepared!
We will also post study guides and review questions to help you with preparation.
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching ModesIn this course, you will be exposed to different programming paradigms, and relationships between them.
Understanding of these concepts will be reinforced in several different ways. Firstly, we will use the lecture sessions in a participatory and interactive manner to encourage thinking through, and more immediate understanding, of new concepts. Secondly, there will be several assignments related to new concepts as they are introduced; the assignments will involve both writing programs (in, for example, Scheme) and explaining how you developed that code. Thirdly, we will use tutorial sessions to reinforce areas of difficulty, and to explore some aspects in greater depth.
We will also post questions each week, with the lecture material. These questions are intended to be done in conjunction with lecture preparation, and will be designed to reinforce understanding needed both for classroom discussion, and for the assignments.
Some aspects of the assignments are challenging, and will give a good understanding of how the ideas can be used in practice.
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.Advanced Programming Paradigms is a 3 unit course. The expectation is that students will devote at least 156 hours to a 3 unit course, including contact hours.
Learning Activities SummaryThe outline of the lecture component of the course will be similar to the following (it is subject to change, the actual schedule will be notified via the Schedule section of the course webpage):
The following lectures explore the functional programming paradigm, and compare it to conventional state-oriented programming; we use the programming language Scheme to do this:
· Elements of functional programming
· Higher Order Functions
· Data Abstraction
· Lambda Calculus
o A model of computation that underlies functional programming
· Modelling State
The following lectures explore relationships to big data and the cloud, parallel computing and so on:
· Streams and Networks of Processes
· Functional Programming, Parallel Computing;
· Big Data and the Cloud
· The Google Map Reduce Programming Model
· Functional Programming in Practice
o Where and how the paradigm is applied
· An Interpreter for Scheme in Scheme
· An Introduction to Logic Programming
Fortnightly tutorials will be held, commencing week 3. Again, see course web and Moodle pages for schedule and content. We give indicative concept areas below, but the actual content may vary.
• Tutorial 1 - Week 3 – Scheme Programming Exercises.
• Tutorial 2 – Week 5 – Data Abstraction and Higher-Order Functions.
• Tutorial 3 – Week 7 – Streams and Lambda Calculus.
• Tutorial 4 – Week 9 – Lambda Calculus and Logic Programming.
• Tutorial 5 – Week 11 – Review Topics.
Specific Course RequirementsNot applicable.
Small Group Discovery ExperienceNot applicable.
The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Assessment SummaryThe assessment for this subject consists of three components with the following weightings:
Examination – 60%
Practical Assignments and Report – 30%
Two assignments, for 10% each.
One written report, on an extension topic, worth 10%.
Other Activities – 10%, comprising
Participation in review quizzes – 3%
Formal quizzes during the course – 7%The hurdle requirement is the Examination.
Review quizzes are the means by which we will post questions with each lecture, and make up part of preparation for each lecture: as mentioned previously, some questions will be discussed during the lecture. All review quizzes will remain available until the end of the semester. The purpose of a review quiz is not so much to get the correct answer at first attempt, but to provide insight into the course material,and help you see ways to improve your understanding. Hence, with review quizzes, marks are awarded for participation rather than correctness.. The marks for participation in review quizzes will be awarded based on individual participation in these quizzes, as recorded by Canvas: criteria for this aspect will be week by week continuity of participation across the semester.
There will also be formal online quizzes, set through Canvas: for this, marks will be awarded for correct answers. You will be notified of these well in advance, both in lechures and via the course forum.
Details will be posted on the course web page.
Below are the CBOK mappings:
Component Abstraction Design Interpersonal Communication Programming
Lecture x x x
Tutorials 3 5 3 5
Exam 3 5 4
Assignments 3 5 3 5
Quizzes 3 2 4
Assessment Related Requirements
In order to pass, students must achieve an overall passing grade and not score less than 40% in the hurdle component. The examination is designated as the hurdle component for this course; the coursework component comprises the assignments and other activities described above.
Assessment DetailThe coursework component includes practical assignments and a written report. Assignment descriptions will be made available on the course website.
The assignments contribute 30% to course assessment: the relative contribution of each assignment will be advised at the time.
Written exam: this will be a two-hour closed book exam. Questions will test understanding of concepts presented during the course, and ability to apply them to problems.
SubmissionAll programming submissions will be made through the school's web submission gateway, available on the school web site (http://www.cs.adelaide.edu.au). Other assignments may be submitted through other electronic means that will be clearly identified in the assignment description. No physical submissions of work will be accepted unless specifically requested by the lecturer.
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme) Grade Mark Description FNS Fail No Submission F 1-49 Fail P 50-64 Pass C 65-74 Credit D 75-84 Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction CN Continuing NFE No Formal Examination RP Result Pending
Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Final results for this course will be made available through Access Adelaide.
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and speaking skills
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- International Student Support
- AUU Student Care - Advocacy, confidential counselling, welfare support and advice
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
- Reasonable Adjustments to Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangement Policy
- Academic Honesty Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Elder Conservatorium of Music Noise Management Plan
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student’s disciplinary procedures.
The University of Adelaide is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The University of Adelaide therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.