SOCI 3001 - Key Thinkers in Sociology

North Terrace Campus - Semester 1 - 2017

In this capstone course for the Sociology Major we will examine the main strands of sociological thought and identify the key thinkers in the development of sociological theory. Hence the course will focus on the writings of leading social theorists and sociologists, their contribution to the development of a distinctly sociological theory, and their continuing impact on current theoretical debates in sociology. Each week will focus on different key thinkers including Marx, Durkheim, Weber, Goffman, Foucault, Baudrillard and Bauman.

  • General Course Information
    Course Details
    Course Code SOCI 3001
    Course Key Thinkers in Sociology
    Coordinating Unit Gender Studies and Social Analysis
    Term Semester 1
    Level Undergraduate
    Location/s North Terrace Campus
    Units 6
    Contact Up to 3 hours per week
    Available for Study Abroad and Exchange Y
    Prerequisites At least 15 units of Sociology major courses
    Course Description In this capstone course for the Sociology Major we will examine the main strands of sociological thought and identify the key thinkers in the development of sociological theory. Hence the course will focus on the writings of leading social theorists and sociologists, their contribution to the development of a distinctly sociological theory, and their continuing impact on current theoretical debates in sociology. Each week will focus on different key thinkers including Marx, Durkheim, Weber, Goffman, Foucault, Baudrillard and Bauman.
    Course Staff

    Course Coordinator: Dr Dee Michell

    Course Timetable

    The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from Course Planner.

  • Learning Outcomes
    Course Learning Outcomes
    On successful completion of this course students will be able to:
    1. Understand and critique the foremost arguments of key sociological thinkers.
    2. Describe a range of key concepts and theoretical approaches within sociology
    3. Demonstrate a sociological understanding of the nature of social relationships, diverse groups and institutions as discussed in key sociological texts.
    4. Drawing upon key sociologists be able to critically reflect upon the processes that underpin social change and social stability
    University Graduate Attributes

    This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:

    University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s)
    Deep discipline knowledge
    • informed and infused by cutting edge research, scaffolded throughout their program of studies
    • acquired from personal interaction with research active educators, from year 1
    • accredited or validated against national or international standards (for relevant programs)
    1,2,3,4
    Critical thinking and problem solving
    • steeped in research methods and rigor
    • based on empirical evidence and the scientific approach to knowledge development
    • demonstrated through appropriate and relevant assessment
    1,3,4
    Teamwork and communication skills
    • developed from, with, and via the SGDE
    • honed through assessment and practice throughout the program of studies
    • encouraged and valued in all aspects of learning
    1
    Career and leadership readiness
    • technology savvy
    • professional and, where relevant, fully accredited
    • forward thinking and well informed
    • tested and validated by work based experiences
    2,3,4
    Intercultural and ethical competency
    • adept at operating in other cultures
    • comfortable with different nationalities and social contexts
    • Able to determine and contribute to desirable social outcomes
    • demonstrated by study abroad or with an understanding of indigenous knowledges
    3,4
    Self-awareness and emotional intelligence
    • a capacity for self-reflection and a willingness to engage in self-appraisal
    • open to objective and constructive feedback from supervisors and peers
    • able to negotiate difficult social situations, defuse conflict and engage positively in purposeful debate
    1,3,4
  • Learning Resources
    Required Resources
    Harrington, A. (2005) Modern Social Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Stones, R. (2008) Key Sociological Thinkers. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
    Recommended Resources
    Reading lists, web-links, library resources, essay writing guides, study guides, referencing, IT support and TURNITIN will be available
    Online Learning
    The MyUni site will contain some additional resources and materials. Each week after the lecture, the lecture slides and lecture recording will be uploaded. Announcements and a discussion board are activated for student queries and the passing on of course information.
  • Learning & Teaching Activities
    Learning & Teaching Modes
    Lectures provide key information about a particular sociologist. This information is then supplemented and supported by work in seminars.

    In each seminar students will work in groups of up to 6 students, to complete small group discussion exercises that require collecting information (from course materials and other sources), analysing problems, debating issues and making recommendations. They will share the results of their discussion with the rest of the class. The tutor will be available for assistance on request, and will work closely with at least one small group each week to provide further expertise, encouragement and guidance.
    Workload

    The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.

    1x1 hour lecture per week 12 hours per semester
    1x2 hour seminarl per week 24 hours per semester
    2 hour online discussion and posting per week 24 hours per semester
    9 hours reading per week 84 hours per semester
    9 hours research per week 84 hours per semester

    Total: 312 hours per semester
    Learning Activities Summary
    Week 1 Introduction
    Week 2 Marx
    Week 3 Durkheim
    Week 4 Goffman
    Week 6 Garfinkel
    Week 7 Western Marxism
    Week 8 Foucault
    Week 9 Lyotard
    Weekl 10 Baudrillard
    Week 11 Bauman
    Week 12 Concluding Thoughts
    Small Group Discovery Experience
    In each seminar students will work in groups of up to 6 students, to complete small group discussion exercises that require collecting information (from course materials and other sources), analysing problems, debating issues and making recommendations. They will share the results of their discussion with the rest of the class. The tutor will be available for assistance on request, and will work closely with at least one small group each week to provide further expertise, encouragement and guidance.
  • Assessment

    The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:

    1. Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
    2. Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
    3. Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
    4. Assessment must maintain academic standards.

    Assessment Summary

    ASSESSMENT TASK

    TASK TYPE

    WEIGHTING

    COURSE LEARNING OUTCOME(S)

    2500 word book review

    Formative and Summative

    30

    1, 2, 4

    Group presentation

    Formative and Summative

    20

    1,2

    3500 critical essay

    Summative

    40

    1,3,4

    Participation in online discussion

    Formative and Summative

    10

    1,2,3,4

    Assessment Detail
    • 2500 word book review: students will be given a choice of key sociological texts and will be required to write a review encompassing key arguments and critical reflections on the limitations - 30% weighting.
    • Group Presentation: Students will be allocated a tutorial topic to present (in small groups) in the tutorial -20% weighting.
    • 3500 word critical essay: Students will be required to write a research essay chosen from topics to be circulated in week 6 - 40% weighting.
    • Participation in online discussion -10% weighting.
    Submission
    The two written assignments are to be submitted electronically via MyUni.
    Course Grading

    Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:

    M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme)
    Grade Mark Description
    FNS   Fail No Submission
    F 1-49 Fail
    P 50-64 Pass
    C 65-74 Credit
    D 75-84 Distinction
    HD 85-100 High Distinction
    CN   Continuing
    NFE   No Formal Examination
    RP   Result Pending

    Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.

    Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.

    Final results for this course will be made available through Access Adelaide.

  • Student Feedback

    The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.

    SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.

  • Student Support
  • Policies & Guidelines
  • Fraud Awareness

    Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student’s disciplinary procedures.

The University of Adelaide is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The University of Adelaide therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.