PHIL 1111OL - An Intensive Introduction to Logic
Online - Summer - 2023
General Course Information
Course Code PHIL 1111OL Course An Intensive Introduction to Logic Coordinating Unit Philosophy Term Summer Level Undergraduate Location/s Online Units 3 Contact Up to 6 hours per week online intensive Available for Study Abroad and Exchange Y Incompatible PHIL 1110 Course Description Logic is fundamental to the way humans communicate. Our public debates and private reasoning are shaped by logical principles, even though most of us would struggle to spell them out. An Intensive Introduction to Logic will cover the basics of formal logic, which provides symbolic methods for representing and assessing the logical form of arguments. You will develop an understanding of symbolic language and logic, as well as familiarity with precise models of deductive reasoning. However, no previous experience with symbolic methods or mathematics is assumed. There are no prerequisites, but some students find that Argument and Critical Thinking is a useful companion class.
This course is offered intensively. Engagement with course content and assessment tasks from the very start of the course is essential for success.
Course Coordinator: Associate Professor Antony Eagle
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from Course Planner.
Course material is supplied in screencast micro-lectures and online discussion boards, and students can engage with course content on a timetable of their own choosing and without coming to campus. There are also twice-weekly timetabled online tutorials where students can get help with problems and concepts with the support of teaching staff and their peers.
Students can expect to be involved in learning and assessment activities for this course between January 2 and February 21, 2023. Tutorials begin January 10 and finish February 16.
Course Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this course students will be able to:
- Represent the structure of statements and arguments using a formal logical framework;
- Assess formalised arguments for validity using truth tables and deductive methods;
- Apply these formal methods to clarify and assess real-world arguments;
- Display knowledge of and facility with symbolic logic under a variety of assessment conditions;
- Demonstrate understanding of interpretative questions and controversies arising from formal approaches to real world statements and arguments.
University Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s)
Attribute 1: Deep discipline knowledge and intellectual breadth
Graduates have comprehensive knowledge and understanding of their subject area, the ability to engage with different traditions of thought, and the ability to apply their knowledge in practice including in multi-disciplinary or multi-professional contexts.
Attribute 2: Creative and critical thinking, and problem solving
Graduates are effective problems-solvers, able to apply critical, creative and evidence-based thinking to conceive innovative responses to future challenges.
Attribute 3: Teamwork and communication skills
Graduates convey ideas and information effectively to a range of audiences for a variety of purposes and contribute in a positive and collaborative manner to achieving common goals.
Attribute 8: Self-awareness and emotional intelligence
Graduates are self-aware and reflective; they are flexible and resilient and have the capacity to accept and give constructive feedback; they act with integrity and take responsibility for their actions.
There is an open access textbook that is freely downloadable:
Antony Eagle, Tim Button, and PD Magnus (2021) Forallx Adelaide https://github.com/antonyeagle/forallx-adl/raw/master/forallx-adl.pdf.
The course is structured around this text, so all students are required to familiarise themselves with it.
I strongly urge students to download this text and begin reading it as soon as they enrol. The intensive nature of the course means some prior preparation will really help, giving you the best chance of understanding the material in the short time available. A good start would be to look through sections 1–7, the bulk of chapters 1 and 2; push on to chapter 3, sections 8–13, if you have time.
Online LearningThis course is run wholly online and almost entirely asynchronously, with the exception of the zoom tutorials.
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching Modes
No information currently available.
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.
This course is offered intensively, with four weeks allocated indicatively to content mastery, and two weeks to take-home examination. The course workload is equivalent to a semester-length course:
WORKLOAD TOTAL HOURS STRUCTURED LEARNING 6 hours equivalent lectures per week 24 hours per semester 6 x 15 minute discussion activities per week 6 hours per semester 4 x 30 minute quiz answer review per week 6 hours per semester Sub-total 36 hours SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING 9 hours reading/revision per week 54 hours per semester 4 hours quiz revision/completion per week 24 hours per semester 4 x 7.5 hours take home exam preparation 30 hours per semester 2 hours completion of sample exercises per week 12 hours per semester Sub-total 120 hours TOTAL 156 hours per semester
Learning Activities Summary
Students can engage with course content on their own schedule, so long as they are prepared for the two take-home exams at the appropriate times. You expect the following broad pattern of activities when enrolled in this course. Note that each section of the course is associated with assessed online quizzes.
Date Course Week Activity/Content Textbook sections covered January 2–8 1 The nature of argument §§1–3 (~24 pages) January 9–15 2 Sentential logic §§4–7 (~38 pages) January 16–22 3 Truth tables §§8–13 (~42 pages) January 23–29 4
Proofs in sentential logic
§§26–29, §§31–32 (~63 pages)
Beginning quantified logic
§§15–17 (~40 pages) February 6–12 6 Identity and descriptions;
interpretations and semantics
§§18–25 (~78 pages) February 13–19 7
Proofs in quantified logic
§35, §§37–39 (~41 pages)
Please note: course content is unlocked as you progress through MyUni modules, so you must complete the quizzes for earlier topics before you will be able to access lectures, etc., for later topics.
The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
ASSESSMENT TASK TASK TYPE WEIGHTING COURSE LEARNING OUTCOME(S) Online quizzes, set 1 Formative and Summative 20% 1,2,3,4 Online quizzes, set 2 Formative and Summative 20% 1,2,3,4 Take home final exam Summative 60% 1,2,3,4,5
Assessment Description % weighting Online quizzes set 1 Students complete online quizzes through MyUni associated with each topic in modules 1–4. There are 18 short quizzes, each worth the same amount, to a total of 20% of the course mark. The lowest quiz marks are dropped. You should aim to complete the quizzes by January 30th. 20% Online quizzes set 2 Students complete online quizzes through MyUni associated with each topic in modules 5–7. There are 13 short quizzes, each worth the same amount, to a total of 20% of the course mark. The lowest quiz marks are dropped. You should aim to complete the quizzes by February 16th. 20% Final take home test Students complete a take home open book exam on the course material. Students have 72 hours to complete the exam. Due February 20th. 60%
No information currently available.
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme) Grade Mark Description FNS Fail No Submission F 1-49 Fail P 50-64 Pass C 65-74 Credit D 75-84 Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction CN Continuing NFE No Formal Examination RP Result Pending
Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Final results for this course will be made available through Access Adelaide.
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and speaking skills
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- International Student Support
- AUU Student Care - Advocacy, confidential counselling, welfare support and advice
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
- Reasonable Adjustments to Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
- LinkedIn Learning
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangement Policy
- Academic Honesty Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Elder Conservatorium of Music Noise Management Plan
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student’s disciplinary procedures.
The University of Adelaide is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The University of Adelaide therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.