LAW 6004B - Law Reform Part B (Hons)
North Terrace Campus - Semester 2 - 2019
General Course Information
Course Code LAW 6004B Course Law Reform Part B (Hons) Coordinating Unit Adelaide Law School Term Semester 2 Level Undergraduate Law (LLB) Location/s North Terrace Campus Units 3 Available for Study Abroad and Exchange N Restrictions Available only to Bachelor of Laws Honours students Course Description Adelaide Law Reform AlB explores the field of law at a sophisticated level through critical analysis of existing law and policy. These subjects require students to review, analyse and synthesise the scholarly research of experienced scholars in the field of law. This subject requires students to exercise critical thinking and judgment in their analysis of existing legal policy and develop new understanding of research pathways through the review of legal scholarship. Students demonstrate these skills through the drafting of proposed legal reform, advising and editing researchers on their scholarly writing and reporting.
Course Coordinator: Dr David Plater
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from Course Planner.
Course Learning OutcomesThis course seeks to equip students with an appreciation of the methods of law reform and the distinct role a law reform agency has in the modernisation of the law.
On successful completion of this course, students will be able to:
1. Explain how the historical and modern context of law reform impacts upon the role and operation of law reform agencies;
2. Explain the legislative, constitutional, executive, political and community contexts to law reform:
3. Identify the challenges of law reform and how such challenges have been or can be addressed (including an example such as relating to an Indigenous law reform issue);
4. Undertake high level research and analysis of an assigned area of the law within its comparative and policy and legal dimensions and make reasoned findings and conclusions;
5. Present an argument, both in writing and orally, into a specific legal problem by demonstrating research skills, understanding of the relevant area of the law, the policy and practical implications arising and skills in effective oral and written communciation to a broad audience;
6. Critically analyse and provide constructive feedback on presentations, reports and other items as to their effectiveness and persuasion.
University Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) Deep discipline knowledge
- informed and infused by cutting edge research, scaffolded throughout their program of studies
- acquired from personal interaction with research active educators, from year 1
- accredited or validated against national or international standards (for relevant programs)
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Critical thinking and problem solving
- steeped in research methods and rigor
- based on empirical evidence and the scientific approach to knowledge development
- demonstrated through appropriate and relevant assessment
3, 4, 5, 6 Teamwork and communication skills
- developed from, with, and via the SGDE
- honed through assessment and practice throughout the program of studies
- encouraged and valued in all aspects of learning
4, 5, 6 Career and leadership readiness
- technology savvy
- professional and, where relevant, fully accredited
- forward thinking and well informed
- tested and validated by work based experiences
3, 4, 5, 6 Intercultural and ethical competency
- adept at operating in other cultures
- comfortable with different nationalities and social contexts
- Able to determine and contribute to desirable social outcomes
- demonstrated by study abroad or with an understanding of indigenous knowledges
1, 2, 3, 6 Self-awareness and emotional intelligence
- a capacity for self-reflection and a willingness to engage in self-appraisal
- open to objective and constructive feedback from supervisors and peers
- able to negotiate difficult social situations, defuse conflict and engage positively in purposeful debate
4, 5, 6
Required ResourcesText Book
There is no set textbook.
Brian R. Opeskin and David Weisbrot (eds), The Promise of Law Reform (Federation Press, 2005) is somewhat dated but is stiill useful.
Depending upon the relevant law reform project(s), the relevant legislation will be required. This will be discussed at the seminar.
Students should also be aware of the Commonwealth, State and Territory Law Reform bodies which are listed on the South Australian Law Reform Institute (SALRI) webpage.
Students should also be aware of the State Attorney-General's Department website which will note ongoing law reform and legislative issues.
Students should be aware that particular law reform issues can be topical and change at very short notice depending upon various factors. The actual law reform topics to be covered as part of this course may be subject to change.
Students will be provided with various articles and sources and references during the course.
Recommended ResourcesStudents will be informed of recommended resources. It will depend upon the applicable law reform topic(s) that are covered in the course. Links to relevant articles and/or reports will be made available on the MYUNI course website.
Students will be provided with various articles and sources and references during the course.
There will be various guest speakers from government, legal practice, the media, the community and the judiciary during the course. Additional recommended resources may be provided to help students prepare and engage with such guest speakers.
Online LearningVarious on line resources will be made available to students during the course. Students will be provided with various articles and sources and references on the course website during the course. Previous student work will be provided for guidance.
Students in particular as part of the course will critique and provide constructive feedback on examples of written and oral presentations, online, using a rubric to be provided as to the effectiveness and persuasion of such presentations. The course aims to support and develop the skills of students in both oral and written communication.
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching ModesLearning and Teaching Activities amounting to 36 hours (across lecture, seminar and structured learning activity formats) will be offered to students in this course.
The primary teaching mode will be the weekly seminars. These are not in lecture form. Seminars will often be in the form of interactive discussions. There will quite often be no simple right or wrong answer to the topic under discussion.
Students will be expected to have conducted the pre-class reading and research. Students will be required to come to seminars fully prepared and willing and able to enter into the discussions relating to the relevant materials. Questions will be provided relating to the course readings that will assist to support, focus and structure the individual learning of students.
The seminar will be an important part of the learning in this course. Students will be expected to actively contribute to the seminar and in doing so develop their important skills in both oral and written communication and presentation. Students will regularly be called upon to present and lead discussion of the materials and their individual research.
Students will also analyse and provide constructive reflection and feedback on both written and oral communciation and the class presentations showing these skills.
In addition to seminar attendance and discussion, weekly research activities may be assigned. Students will use these structured exercises to inform discussion of particular activities undertaken in class.
There will be various guest speakers from government, legal practice, the media, the community and the judiciary during the course. Students should take the valuable opportunity to fully engage with such guest speakers who are kindly sharing their time and expertise. It goes without saying that students should always treat any guest speaker with professionalism.
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.The University expects full-time students (i.e. those taking 12 units per semester) to devote a total of 48 hours per week to their studies. This means that you are expected to commit approximately 9 hours of private study in addition to your regular classes.
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the specific course requirements.
Law Reform Hons A and Law Reform Hons B is a full year university course. It consists of one continuing 3 unit subject. The course runs over both Semester 1 and 2 of the academic year. Students will have 2 hours of class time per week plus up to 1 hour of structured activities. Students will expect to spend at least 2 hours each week in independent study related to the course.
Learning Activities Summary
Part 1: Preparation for research assignment and feedback term 1
Part 2: Law Reform and the executive and Parliament (introduction)
Discussion of course outline, Planning research assignment (not just what the law is but what it could be and should be) and feedback from last semester
Introduction to the processes of law reform
Research Assignment topics raised
Part 1: Law reform through the executive and Parliament
Critical discussion of set reading
Part 2: The role of the modern Attorney-General
Guest Presentation by former Attorney-General
Executive, legislative and political processes for law reform
Seminar conducted by the Attorney-General and the Attorney General’s Department
Part 1: Law Reform through the courts: Judicial activism vs judicial restraint?
Critical discussion of set reading
Part 2: Using Hansard and case authorities in law reform essays
Part 3: Assignment overview and confirmation topic
Preparation for law reform assignment and Opportunity to discuss Report outline
Selection research essay topics
Law Reform through the courts (cont): Judicial activism vs judicial restraint?
Structure for law reform essays
Critical discussion of set reading
Preparation for law reform assignment and Progress review
Part 1: Role of the Media in Law Reform
Part 2: Role of 'Pressure Group' in Law Reform
Guest Speaker with student input
Part 1: Criminal justice reform: 'Law and Order' and Implications for Law Reform
Part 2: Student questions and progress updates
Part 1: Civil Law reform and Social Justice
Part 2: Law Reform in Action
Student presentation and discussion
Student presentation and discussion
Student presentation and discussion
Legal Education and Law Reform
The Future of Law Reform
Course Overview and Class or Guest Discussion
The role of legal education in law reform
"Are we there yet': ideas for the future
Research Assignment Due
Specific Course RequirementsAttendance is required as part of the course unless students have a valid reason for inability to attend.
The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Honours students will additionally in both terms 1 and 2 research and critically analyse (no more than two pages) a topical law reform proposal relating to the course. Honours students must consider if this an effective proposal and addresses relevant points that arise. Honours students should explain why this is or is not an effective proposal. There will be discussion in class of the factors to consider.Please note that this summary refers to assessment for the whole year (Law Reform Part A in Semester 1 and Law Reform Part B in Semester 2).
Class participation is one mark assessed over both Semester 1 and Semester 2 (10% of the total marks for this course).
Assessment Task Task Type (Group or Individual) Due Weighting Redeemable (yes/no) Course Learning Outcome Length Literature and Case Review (Semester 1) Individual
Friday, last week semester 1
35% No 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 1500 words Research Assignment (Semester 2) Individual Friday, last week semester 2 55% No 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 3500 words Class Participation (over both Semester 1 and 2) Individual Ongoing
No 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Honours Reserach exercise Individual Friday, week 11, semester 2 Pass/Fail No 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 600 words
Assessment Related Requirements
Attendance and active participation in seminars is required as part of the course as the active input of students is integral to this course. The classes do not consist of lectures but rather facilitated class discussion of the law reform process and the issues that arise as well as the various references of the SA Law Reform institute that the class will consider during the course.
Honours students will additionally in both terms 1 and 2 research and critically analyse (no more than two pages) a topical law reform proposal relating to the course. Honours students must consider if this an effective proposal and addresses relevant points that arise. Honours students should explain why this is or is not an effective proposal. There will be discussion in class of the factors to consider.
Participation in Seminars – weighting 10%
Students will be assessed on the quality of their contributions to the seminars. This assessment will address the following learning objectives identified in the assessment scheme: 2 (a-c) and (e). It also covers Course Learning Outcomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
Students should be able to engage in the literature and present opinions and foster discussion based upon the materials. In particular students will:
address specific questions of law, policy or practice raised by the literature and the seminar leader, and
give presentations of their assignments to the class and critique and provide constructive feedback on the presentations of other students.
Literature and Case Review – weighting 35%
Students will present a literature and case review relating to the assigned research project. This is likely to be linked to the ongoing work of the Law Reform Institute. This assessment will address the learning objectives identified in the assessment scheme: 2.1 (c-f). It also covers Course Learning Outcomes 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. There will be an emphasis on the research, understanding of the relevant law and the skills of oral and written presentation in both the literature and case review.
For this assessment, students will be required to submit a written paper AND give a seminar presentation of their review to the class before submitting the written paper for assessment. This assessment task has a weighting of 35% of the mark for the course, comprising 25% for the written paper and 10% for the presentation.
The written Literature and Case Review is due onthe last day of Semester 1 Week 12.
Research Assignment – weighting 55%
The Research Assignment will address the learning objective identified in the assessment scheme: 2.1 (c-f). It also covers Course Learning Outcomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
The Research Assignment will be likely to be determined by the particular project(s) being undertaken by the Law Reform Institute. Specific aspects of the research activity will be determined by the end of Semester 1.
The research assignment will allow students to undertake detailed research in an assigned area of the law and examine the legal, policy and practical implications arising and to make reasoned and specific recommendations for law reform. The research assignment provides students with the opportunity to demonstrate their understanding of the relevant law and its implications in a law reform and policy context, capacity to identify a research question and analyse relevant legal materials and to make considered recommendations and to develop and demonstrate their skills in oral and written presentation to a broad audience. The focus is not only on what the relevant law is, but what it could and should be. For this assessment, students will be required to submit a written paper AND give a seminar presentation of their review to the class before submitting the written paper for assessment. This assessment task has a weighting of 55% of the mark for the course, comprising 45% for the written paper and 10% for the presentation.
The written Research Assignment is due on the last day of Semester 2 Week 12.
All assessment is summative. All assessment is compulsory. All assessment is to be undertaken individually. Although there are collaborative activities all assessment task are to be undertaken by the individual student.
Replacement Research Assignment
Where a student fails the course but qualifies for replacement assessment under the Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessments, they will be required to submit a new Replacement Research Assignment on a new topic provided by the course co-ordinator. This Replacement Research Assignment topic will cover a wide range of material examined in the course and will be due two weeks after the posting of the final results for the course. Formal requirements for the Replacement Research Assignment will be the same as for the primary Research Essay, however the Replacement Research Assignment will be weighted in accordance with the Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment policy.
Assessment DetailPARTICIPATION IN SEMINARS – weighting 10% of the total marks for this course (one mark applies to participation over the whole year (ie: in both Semester 1 and Semester 2)
Students are expected to attend and participate fully in seminars.
Grade Descriptors for Class Participation are as follows:
High Distinction 85-100
Regular attendance at classes, outstanding level of quality contribution to class discussion demonstrating a strong understanding of concepts, high level of analysis and strong capacity to identify issues, clear understanding of cases and materials, strong responsiveness to the contributions of others, insightful and considered and constructive feedback, and evidence of thorough reading of set material and preparation for class.
Regular attendance at classes, frequent contributions to class discussion of a highly developed nature demonstrating clear understanding of concepts, high level of analysis and clear capacity to identify issues, sound understanding of cases and materials, strong responsiveness to the contributions of others, considered and helpful feedback and evidence of reading set material and preparation for class.
Regular attendance at classes, frequent contributions to class discussion demonstrating thoughtful approach to materials and clear understanding of concepts, capacity to analyse cases and material and identify issues, responsiveness to the contributions of others, helpful feedback and evidence of reading set material and preparation for class.
Regular attendance at classes, limited contributions to class discussion but adequate to demonstrate understanding of concepts and capacity to analyse cases and material and identify issues, basic responsiveness to the contributions of others, basic feedback and evidence of reading set material and preparation for class.
Failure to regularly attend classes, limited contributions and lack of responsiveness to questions, no effort at engagement or feedback, inability to demonstrate understanding of concepts or capacity to analyse cases and material and identify issues, limited or poor evidence of reading set material and preparation for class.
LITERATURE AND CASE REVIEW – weighting 35%
For further information on the Literature and Case Review, please refer to the Course Outline for Law Reform Part A.
RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT – weighting 55%
Given the special nature of the course and the need to align the research activities of the course with those of the Law Reform Institute the specific topics for the Research Assignment will not be known prior to the commencement of the course. It is anticipated that the research topics will be distributed by the end of Semester 1.
The objective of the research assignment is to review an area of law that has been identified as needing reform and to present and examine a range of reform options.
The Research Assignment is due by 2.00pm on the last day of Semester 2 Week 12.
There will be a penalty for late submissions of 10% per day or part day. This penalty is NOT 10% of the mark but of the assessment. For example an assignment that obtains a mark of 70% which is two days late will incur a penalty of 20%. The final mark would be 50%.
The research essay is to be a maximum of 3500 words. There will be a penalty of 10% imposed for essays that exceed this word length. There is no leeway. 3500 words means a MAXIMUM of 3500 words. Reasonable use of footnotes will not count towards this. The research assignment requires original and independent research AND a presentation of the written paper to the class before it is submitted for assessment. The written paper will be assessed at 50% and the presentation will be assessed at 5% of the mark for this course. These exercises involve both written and oral communication and persuasion.
Citation and referencing
The research essay must comply with The Australian Guide to Legal Citation (3rdedition) ‘AGLC3’. AGLC3 is available for purchase from bookshops or may be accessed at http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/aglc
Grade Descriptors for the Research Essay are as follows:
High Distinction: 85 – 100
Demonstrates an outstanding level of understanding and presentation and a very strong degree of originality and insight in addressing the research question asked; evidence of reading of, reflection on, and high level understanding of materials beyond the core texts and cases that are relevant to the essay topic; very strong knowledge of principles and concepts and evidence of an awareness and understanding of deeper and more subtle aspects of the topic and the ability to consider issues in the context of the discipline; clear evidence of strong ability to construct a coherent and logical argument based on evidence, and evidence of imagination and flair in so doing; strong evidence of analytical and evaluative skills and ability to apply fundamental concepts; very strong evidence of independent research on the topic; highly developed skills in expression, spelling, grammar and presentation; and complete accuracy in use of correct forms of legal citation.
Distinction: 75 – 84
Demonstrates a very high level of understanding and presentation and a strong degree of originality and insight in addressing the research question asked; evidence of reading of, reflection on, and clear understanding of materials beyond the core texts and cases that are relevant to the essay topic; sound knowledge of principles and concepts and evidence of an awareness and understanding of deeper and more subtle aspects of the topic; clear evidence of good ability to construct a coherent and logical argument based on evidence, and evidence of imagination and flair in so doing; clear evidence of analytical and evaluative skills and ability to apply fundamental concepts; strong evidence of independent research on the topic; well developed skills in expression, spelling, grammar and presentation; and very high rate of accuracy in use of correct forms of legal citation.
Credit: 65 – 74
Demonstrates a high level of understanding and presentation and a degree of originality and insight in addressing the research question asked; evidence of reading of, reflection on, and clear understanding of the core materials relevant to the essay topic; sound knowledge of principles and concepts; clear evidence of good ability to construct a coherent and logical argument based on evidence; clear evidence of analytical and evaluative skills and ability to apply fundamental concepts; clear evidence of independent research on the topic; good skills in expression, spelling, grammar and presentation; and high rate of accuracy in use of correct forms of legal citation.
Pass: 50 – 64
Satisfies the minimum in addressing the research question asked; some evidence of basic reading of and reflection on the core materials necessary to understand the essay topic; knowledge of principles and concepts adequate to communicate intelligently in the topic and to serve as a basis for further study; evidence of basic ability to construct a coherent argument; some evidence of analytical and evaluative skills; some evidence of independent research on the topic; adequate skills in expression, spelling, grammar and presentation; and few errors in accuracy in use of correct forms of legal citation.
Fail: 0 – 49
Fails to satisfy the minimum requirements and does not answer the research question; very little evidence of having read any of the core materials necessary to understand the essay topic; scant knowledge of principles and concepts; very little evidence of ability to construct a coherent argument; very little evidence of analytical and evaluative skills; no evidence of independent research on the topic; rudimentary skills in expression, spelling, grammar and presentation; and inaccurate use of correct forms of legal citation.
SubmissionStandard Adelaide Law School submission requirements apply.
By the due date all submissions should be submitted via TURNITIN and an electronic copy emailed to the Course Coordinator.
All Assignments must comply with the following:
All Assignments should beone and a half spaced and havemargins wide enough to allow for comments and feedback by the examiner.
Students must also submit an electronic copy of their assignment in Word format to the Course Coordinator by the due date for the assignment.
Students must retain a copy (including anelectronic copy) of the Seminar Paper and Research Essay they submit. Students may be required to submit their seminar paper and/or research essay to an electronic plagiarism detection software (SafeAssign or Turnitin) and, in any event, are encouraged to use these software programs themselves as a check for plagiarism and the academic integrity of their work.
All Assignmentsmust be attached to a signed Assignment Cover Sheet. Examiners will withhold a student’s results until such time as the student has signed the Assignment Cover Sheet. Examiners can refuse to accept assignments that do not have a signed acknowledgement of the University’s policy on academic honesty/plagiarism (refer to policy below). Students must also include on the coversheeta statement as to word length to their Seminar Paper and Research Essay. Reasonable use of footnotes will not be included in the word count.
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M11 (Honours Mark Scheme) Grade Grade reflects following criteria for allocation of grade Reported on Official Transcript Fail A mark between 1-49 F Third Class A mark between 50-59 3 Second Class Div B A mark between 60-69 2B Second Class Div A A mark between 70-79 2A First Class A mark between 80-100 1 Result Pending An interim result RP Continuing Continuing CN
Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.Courses for which a result of conceded pass has been obtained may not be presented towards the degree requirements for the Bachelor of Laws or the Honours Degree of Bachelor of Laws programs, or any postgraduate law program, nor to satisfy prerequisite requirements within any law course.
Final results for this course will be made available through Access Adelaide.
Finality of Assessment Grades
Students are advised that Course Coordinators will not enter into negotiations of any kind with any student regarding changes to their grades. It is irrelevant, in any given circumstance, that only a minimal number of additional marks are required to inflate a student’s grade for any individual assessment item or course as a whole. Pursuant to the University’s Assessment for Coursework Programs Policyand the Adelaide Law School Assessment Policies and Procedures, grades may only be varied through the appropriate channels for academic review (such as an official re-mark).
ModerationIn accordance with the University’s Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy, course coordinators ‘ensure that appropriate marking guidelines and cross-marking moderation processes across markers are in place’ in each course. Procedures adopted by Adelaide Law School to ensure consistency of marking in courses with multiple markers include:
- assurance of the qualifications of markers, and their knowledge of the content covered in each course;
- detailed marking guidelines and assessment rubrics to assist in the marking of items of assessment;
- sharing of example marked assessments at various grade bands across markers;
- reviewing of selected marked assessments from each marker by the course coordinator;
- comparison of the marks and their distribution across markers;
- automatic double-marking of all interim assessment receiving a fail grade, and of final assessments where a student’s overall result is a fail grade;
- the availability of re-marking of assessments in accordance with Adelaide Law School’s Assessment Policies and Procedures.
Approval of Results by Board of ExaminersStudents are reminded that all assessment results are subject to approval (and possible moderation/change) by the Law School’s Board of Examiners. Assessment results at the University are not scaled. Under the Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy, students are assessed ‘by reference to their performance against pre-determined criteria and standards … and not by ranking against the performance of the student cohort in the course’. However, under that same policy, the Board of Examiners (as the relevant Assessment Review Committee for courses at Adelaide Law School) is required to ‘ensure comparability of standards and consistency’ in assessment. On occasions, the Board of Examiners will form the view that some moderation is required to ensure the comparability of standards and consistency across courses and years, and accordingly provide fairness to all law students. All assessment results are therefore subject to approval (and possible change) until confirmed by the Board of Examiners and posted on Access Adelaide at the end of each semester.
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
The University Writing Centre provides academic learning and language development services and resources for local, international, undergraduate and postgraduate coursework students enrolled at the University of Adelaide.
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and speaking skills
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- International Student Support
- AUU Student Care - Advocacy, confidential counselling, welfare support and advice
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
- Reasonable Adjustments to Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
The centre offers practical advice and strategies for students to master reading, writing, note-taking, time management, oral presentation skills, referencing techniques and exam preparation for success at university through seminars, workshops and individual consultations.
Lex Salus ProgramLex Salus (law and wellbeing) is an initiative of the Adelaide Law School aimed at destigmatising mental health issues; promoting physical, mental and emotional wellness; building a strong community of staff and students; and celebrating diversity within the school. It also seeks to promote wellness within the legal profession, through the involvement of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of South Australia, the Honourable Chris Kourakis, as the official Patron of the program.
Students can participate in the Lex Salus program by attending barbecue lunches, pancake breakfasts, knitting and crochet circles, seminars, guest speakers, conferences and other activities. Our Facebook page, website and regular all-student emails promote upcoming events, and have tips and information on wellness.
Our Lex Salus YouTube channel also includes videos on topics like managing stress, and interviews with LGBTQ lawyers and their supporters which celebrate diversity and individuality. Students who commit to 10 hours of volunteering with Lex Salus in one year can have their service recognised on their academic transcript and through a thank you morning tea with the Chief Justice and law school staff.
Student Life Counselling SupportThe University’s Student Life Counselling Support service provides free and confidential service to all enrolled students. We encourage you to contact the Student Life Counselling Support service on 8313 5663 to make an appointment to deal with any issues that may be affecting your study and life.
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangement Policy
- Academic Honesty Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Elder Conservatorium of Music Noise Management Plan
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
Academic HonestyAcademic dishonesty is a serious act of academic misconduct. All students must be familiar with the University’s Academic Honesty Policy.
Academic dishonesty is a serious matter and is treated as such by the Law School and the University. Academic dishonesty (which goes beyond plagiarism) can be a ground for a refusal by the Supreme Court of South Australia to admit a person to practice as a legal practitioner in South Australia.
Academic honesty is an essential aspect of ethical and honest behaviour, which is central to the practice of the law and an understanding of what it is to be a lawyer.
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student’s disciplinary procedures.
The University of Adelaide is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The University of Adelaide therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.