EDUC 1013 - University Research
North Terrace Campus - Semester 1 - 2014
General Course Information
Course Code EDUC 1013 Course University Research Coordinating Unit School of Education Term Semester 1 Level Undergraduate Location/s North Terrace Campus Units 3 Contact Up to 3 hours per week Assumed Knowledge Students should have completed EDUC 1008 University Culture prior to enrolling in the course Restrictions This class is only open for students in the University Preparatory Program or Wilto Yerlo Preparatory Program. Course Description This course is the second core course of the University Preparatory Program, and can be considered the capstone course of the Program in that it gives students a final preparation for their degree studies. It is also available for students who already have entry into their degree program or have started it, as it builds their capacity to undertake secondary research in a variety of disciplines. This course revolves around a single major research project which draws in all the facets of research activity at the University of Adelaide. Students will build on their skills in critical analysis, note-taking and the systematic collection and analysis of data in the form of scholarly written sources. They will conduct a solo guided enquiry with assignments which build incrementally towards a major research essay in response to a partly self-defined research question.
Course Coordinator: Dr Chad Habel
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from Course Planner.2014 Timetable
Lecture: 9am-10am Tuesdays, SmartE Room, Level 8 Nexus 10
Tutorial: 2pm-4pm Fridays UB361R, Basement, Nexus 10
Course Learning OutcomesUpon successful completion of this course, students should be able to:
- Approach a major research area by exploring its explicit and implicit aspects, and by developing secondary research questions;
- Identify a series of keywords to form a basis for research, and develop broader and narrower search terms in case of insufficient findings;
- Effectively use the University Library, with a focus on electronic databases, to find sources which inform an approach to the broad area of research;
- Use Firefox as an alternative browser to Internet Explorer, as well as Zotero or an alternative bibliographic management tool for collecting reference information
- Read and critically analyse a large number of sources for credibility, reliability and relevance to the research question;
- Develop a thesis argument comprised of a claim linked to evidence, and organise this argument using a plan or outline;
- Compose an effective introduction and conclusion for an essay, as well as body paragraphs that fully develop a main point using evidence;
- Complete a major Research Essay from conception to communication with a systematic and structured strategy for the process of research;
- Assess thier own work and that of other students, and provide appropriately constructive feedback on how to develop each stage of the research process.
University Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
University Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) The ability to locate, analyse, evaluate and synthesise information from a wide variety of sources in a planned and timely manner. 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 An ability to apply effective, creative and innovative solutions, both independently and cooperatively, to current and future problems. 1, 6 Skills of a high order in interpersonal understanding, teamwork and communication. 9 A proficiency in the appropriate use of contemporary technologies. 3, 4 A commitment to continuous learning and the capacity to maintain intellectual curiosity throughout life. 1, 8
Required ResourcesA key activity of this course requires systematic and collaborative research methods using online resources. In particular, students will be required to use article databases to find high-quality, scholarly journal articles on a broad area of research and then a more defined research question.
Recommended ResourcesThis course has a strong focus on researching scholarly sources using online databases through the University of Adelaide Library. This will be covered in class, but success in this area depends on persistence, determination, and sound strategy, so it is strongly recommended that you familiarise yourself with the resources that are available to you. The databases are available at http://www.adelaide.edu.au/library/guide/articles.html
For this course you may wish to use databases that have been tagged on the “Education” page: http://libguides.adelaide.edu.au/content.php?pid=316606&sid=2590774
The Library provides excellent support for the use of databases in scholarly research. Begin with the online training that is available: http://libguides.adelaide.edu.au/content.php?pid=316606&sid=2590774. In particular try the “What is a database and how do I use one?” video.
If you require more one-to-one support, the Library has an excellent help contact form: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/library/help/fbquery.html There is a Research Librarian for the School of Education who can provide direct assistance with developing your article database research skills. This is one of the best support services available at this University, so make use of it.
Online LearningMyUni will be used for essential communication including via email, so please check your University email regularly (at least three times a week). If you have a smartphone it is strongly recommended that you set up your email on it for easy and regular access to your University email. For guidance on how to do this, visit:
Online learning will also be enhanced through the use of Firefox and Zotero (see above).
Remember, the most useful portal for all University online activities is Unified:
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching ModesThe teaching and learning in this course provides a scaffolded, enabling approach to the development of research capacities using innovative technologies and collaboration. Classes will consist of workshops of 2-3 hours long, which will provide information in a pseudo-lecture format with “cognitive modelling” of the processes that students will then practice in class and demonstrate in assessment tasks.
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.
1 x 1 hour lecture per week (x12) = 12 hours
1 x 2 hour tutorial per week (x12) = 24 hours
1 x 4 hours of reading per week and participation in online discussions (x12) = 48 hours
6 hours per week primary research and research writing activities (x12) = 72 hours
Total: 156 hours
Learning Activities SummaryWeek 1: Course introduction; What is research?; Qualitative and quantitative research
Week 2: Critical reading strategies for scholarly sources
Week 3: Search strategies and Library databases
Week 4: Primary research: A brief introduction
Week 5: Critically analysing arguments and developing your own
Week 6: Annotated bibliographies and the rest of your Research Portfolio
Week 7: Developing your research question through mindmapping
Week 8: Developing your essay plan through mindmapping
Week 9: Topic review and reflection
Week 10: Integrating sources into academic writing
Week 11: Drafting paragraphs: body and introduction
Week 12: Redrafting, Editing and proofreading
For clarification on which dates correspond to which weeks, please visit: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/student/dates/
Specific Course RequirementsTo pass this course, students must attend at least 75% of tutorials; in cases of absence for medical or compassionate reasons, documentation must be provided and students must still attend at least 50% of classes. If students fail to attend the minimum required number of tutorials, they will be considered to have not completed an assignment (see below).
Small Group Discovery ExperienceThe University of Adelaide has committed to a pedagogical approach termed the “Small Group Discovery Experience”, indicating that the SHDE will be a core component in a credit-bearing course of every undergraduate program, and that it will be part of every first-year level from 2014. Since the UPP is not an award-based program, it is not strictly required to include an SGDE in the UPP.
However, since the UPP is designed to prepare students for first-year study, and the SGDE will be a core component of all first-year study, it is important for the UPP to provide some preparation in Small Group Discovery. These should be of a scaffolded, preparatory nature as befits each course within the program, and the philosophy and program objectives of the UPP. The Program has been designed to include preparation for small group work and research activity in many of its courses.
More specifically, this course aims to prepare students for their small-group discovery experience by providing a scffolded inquiry learning experience which leads students towards greater autonomy. Importantly, students are led to explore factors around success and failure in higher education by an academic with expertise in this area, and who has extensive experience teaching in higher education contexts, including the UPP. Students learn to define and develop their own area of research interest and to critically engage with scholarly literature to inform their self-defined research question.
The University's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Task Task type Due date Length Weighting Relevant learning objectives Critical Review Formative Friday Week 2 5pm 500 words 5% 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9 Research Portfolio Formative Friday Week 6 5pm 4-5 pages 10% 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9 Essay Plan Formative Friday Week 8 5pm 2 - 3 pages 25% 6 Draft Introduction and Paragraph Formative Monday Week 11 9am Approx. 400 words 10% 7 Major Research Essay Summative Friday Week 13 5pm 2000 words 40% 5, 6, 7, 8 Exam Summative Examination period 2 hours 10% 6, 7
Assessment Related Requirements
Students must attempt all assessment tasks to pass this course. Since the University Preparatory Program is designed to prepare students for success at University, completing and submitting all assignments is central to the intended learning outcomes of the program and each course within it. Often, at least attempting and submitting assignments in the face of difficulty or adversity is enough for success at University and the UPP encourages this resilience by employing this policy in select courses. Please note that the absolute last date for the submission of assignments in Semester 1 is the end of Swot Vac week, which is one week after the final assignment is due.
If a student fails to submit all assessment tasks and would otherwise have received a grade greater than 45, they will be given a nominal grade of 45 (Fail) for that course in that semester. This will permit them to undertake additional assessment (formerly called academic supplementary
assessment) at the Course Coordinator’s discretion, as per policy at http://www.adelaide.edu.au/student/exams/supps.html
It is not necessary to apply for additional assessment; this assessment will usually consist of the missed pieces of assessment, but the course coordinator may require more. As per policy, if the student passes the additional assessment to the Course Coordinator’s satisfaction, the maximum grade they can get for the course is 50 (Pass). If a student’s raw grade is below 45, regardless of whether all tasks have been attempted, this score will stand unless exceptional, documented circumstances apply as per the University’s Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment: https://www.adelaide.edu.au/student/exams/mod_arrange.html
Substantial non-engagement in this course (evidenced by repeated non-attendance at tutorials and failure to submit assessments) may result in students being withdrawn from the University Preparatory Program and being required to apply for reinstatement if they wish to continue.
Assessment DetailAssessment design
The assessment of this course is designed around a single, central activity: the preparation of a major Research Essay. The formative assessment in the course is linked strongly to this main activity, such that all of the assignments and class activities you do are closely aligned with your final Research Essay. It is therefore essential that you are fully engaged and working hard for the whole of the semester, otherwise you will find the final assessment very difficult and will not be likely to do well in it. You will notice that the Research Essay is a high-stakes assessment: it is worth 50% of your grades. This is not uncommon at University, and many courses set 50%-70% of their assessment weighting on a single exam or major written piece. There ias one final exams which is weighted lightly, and is designed to get you familiar with the process of undertaking end-of-semester exams at the University of Adelaide.
Activities and assessment are divided around the mid-semester break. Prior to the break, most of the activities and assessment focus on research and macro-writing skills, which many people spend far too little time on when writing an essay. This means that you will mostly be researching and reading sources found in online databases, and preparing the ideas and argument for the Essay. After the break you will focus largely on micro-writing activities, which includes drafting your paragraphs as well as your introduction and conclusion, and editing and proofreading your drafts.
Assignment 1: Critical Review
This assignment is designed to get you working hard at the beginning of this course, and to begin to develop your skills in reading and analysing scholarly literature that is relevant to your broad research area. Depending on what you study, reading may be the most challenging and time-consuming task you will undertake, so you should work out early what these challenges are and establish some strategies to deal with them.For the purpose of this assignment, select a source from from the bibliography of the preliminary course reading: Habel (2012), which is available on MyUni under the “Content” tool. You may choose any of the journal sources from the Reference list in the Habel article (i.e. NOT a webpage). For this assignment you are only required to read and comment on a single article. Some critical reviews require you to research more widely and compare sources, but this is not necessary for this assignment (unless you feel it is essential). This assignment focuses on your approach, analysis, and critique, and there will be plenty of time for wider research and synthesis later in the course. Therefore your reference list for this assignment may only require a single source to be listed (but it is
still important to ensure the format of this reference is correct).
Remember, though, that not all sources are equal. Some of the sources may not be available in any library, so you’ll need to choose one that is recent and available. Do not select a webpage for your critical review, as you are required to start working with scholarly material (i.e. books and journal articles) immediately in this course. If you would like advice or comments on your choice of reading for your critical review, contact the lecturer. In any case, you will need some basic skills in using the Library catalogue to find your source: for some guidance on this, view the tutorial at http://www.adelaide.edu.au/library/help/tutorials/finding_book/finding_book.html
There are lots of other ways of getting support in using the Library from the Help/Contact page. You may need to physically visit the Library to find your source, or you may find an online version of your source. If you select a large source (i.e. a whole book), you should probably restrict yourself to a single chapter or the introduction for your critical review. Your critical review should only have a very minimal
summary of your chosen source (if any). This means that you should spend very little space (maximum 50 words) describing the source or paraphrasing its main ideas. This is one of the major challenges students find in critical reviews, as description and summary comes more naturally and is easier than proper critique. You can assume that the reader of your critical review is familiar with the source and you do not need to explain it to them. Your critical review should focus on evaluating and critiquing the source. Some of the questions you might like to consider include:
Who wrote the source? Are they credible? Why should you believe them?
How old is the source? Is it possible that more recent research would have an opposing view? Does it seem dated or old-fashioned?
Is the main argument of the source persuasive?
What evidence does the write use to support their case? Is this evidence recent and reliable?
Are there other potential arguments that the author hasn’t considered? What are the other possibilities or explanations for their observations?
Is this source relevant to your broad topic of research in this course? Do you think you are likely to use it in your essay?
For further ideas on criteria for evaluating research, have a look at Table 1 (p. 352) of Tong et al. (2007), which gives much more detailed criteria for critiquing qualitative research especially. The rest of
this article is quite sophisticated, so don’t worry if you have trouble getting through the rest of it, but you should have more skills to read this level of scholarly material by the time you have finished this
Assignment 2: Research Portfolio
This assignment is a little different to most assignments you might be used to: instead of a single document or artefact, you are required to submit a collection of items that demonstrate what you have learned in the first part of the course. Think of it like a musician’s repertoire, or an actor’s showreel, or the portfolio or an architect or a designer: it is not the individual pieces that are so important, but what they represent as a collective.
Therefore, the following items are required for your portfolio. This assignment is designed to gather evidence of your learning as it happens, so you cannot just do it in the week before it is due. Therefore it isessential that you document your search strategy, undertake research and reasearch to create your Annotated Bibliobgraphy, and craft a high-quality Critical Review of one of those readings over time. It will then be much easier to just collect these and submit them for your Portfolio assignment when it is due.
Research Strategy Journal/Documentation
This part of your portfolio should document the precise processes (search terms, results) that you went through in searching through article databases. It is recommended that you keep track of this information as you are doing your research as it will be virtually impossible to recall the information after the fact. You should treat it like a journal and record the following details: the date and time that you were doing the research; the database you searched; the terms you searched for (and their combination or any Boolean operators you used); the number and type of results, and any particular useful results you found. The format and expression of this documentation is not as important as it being detailed and thorough, and it should demonstrate persistence, variety, strategy, adaptability, and real effort. You will be assessed on how well you use the article databases. An example journal entry might be:
22/7/13, 3.30pm: searched for “Higher Education” on Google; found about 600 million sources; browsed first few pages of results; the top ones were mostly newspaper and such; far too many sources and perhaps not a very good database to use.
22/7/13, 4.10pm: performed same search on Google Scholar; some better (more scholarly) results but still too broad (4 million results)
23/7/13, 9am: finally started using Australian Education Index (AEI) via the Library website; same search, better results (38,000). Result 5 was an article entitled “More than just a brain : emotions and the doctoral experience”, which is much closer to my research area as it talks about emotions in learning in higher education, but I’m not sure that I want to research doctoral students.
narrowed search on AEI to “Higher Education undergraduate”: 3,600 results and getting much closer. Need to consider specific aspects of success and failure, so will search for...
Remember, we are assessing that you are doing the process of researching properly, so you don’t need to demonstrate perfect searching skills, just the potential for improving them. You must use article databases through the library, and you must demonstrate your process of narrowing and widening your search, trying different terms, reflecting on how successful it has been, and attempting to use different databases for the same and different search terms. You might like to explain how your searching and reading has helped you to narrow down your research area as you move towards working on the essay. You should also include completed copies of the “Search Strategy Plan” from week 3 as appendices, as well as any additional Plans you have completed as you narrowed down your research area.
For this part of the Portfolio, you will need to complete an Annotated Bibliography (4-5 sources, 75-100 words per annotation) based on the sources you have found using the Library catalogue and databases. Select what you think is the highest-quality source you have found and highlight it some way (i.e. with an asterisk etc.) in your Annotated Bibliography.
An annotated bibliography is first and foremost a bibliography (like a reference list) of some of the sources you have found. Since you have been using Zotero to collect and manage your article information it should be relatively easy to produce the items in the annotated bibliography in a consistent and correct format. It does not matter which referencing system you use (although Harvard is preferred across the University of Adelaide), as long as it is consistent. Ensure that your Library in Zotero is clean and all items in there are entered consistently: for example, if one author’s name is in all capital letters, it will enter your Bibliography in that format.
The second main component of the Annotated Bibliography is the annotations, which describe the main points of the article and your response to it. Your Annotated Bibliography should contain some summary and some critique – please ensure there is an element of critique in it. You should therefore consider how strong and reliable the source is, as well as how relevant and useful it will be for your final essay. You should also note which database you used to find the article, or how else you discovered its existence.
Assignment 3: Essay Plan
Developing a strong and detailed essay plan is essential for efficiently writing quality research essays. Without a plan you are likely to either write too much or too little; you will over-research your topic or find too much irrelevant material; you may write an unclear, incoherent essay that struggles to get marks in a variety of criteria. Most importantly, writing an essay without a plan can be overwhelming, frustrating, annoying, disempowering, and stressful. In contrast, a good plan can make essay-writing an exciting and empowering process where you feel more in control of the material.
A plan allows you to organise your overall thoughts and argument before you start writing them down; decide which main points you will develop to support your argument; decide which sources you will use to support these points; allocate a number of words to each section or paragraph, and consider from a distance the overall logical flow of your argument and how the main points fit together. Put simply, a plan makes an essay easier to write, and a well-planned essay is easier to read and give better marks to (you should always try to make it easy for your reader). This assignment allows you to submit your essay plan for assessment and feedback as a formative process towards writing your major Research Essay. You will be provided with model plans throughout the course, but your Essay Plan should contain the following elements:
Question: The essay question that you have developed for yourself, based on the broad area of research and ideas you have developed through research in the first six week of the course (ensure that the question has been approved by the Course Coordinator);
Thesis: This is your “answer” to the question above: what is the main argument, at the global level of structure, which your essay will aim to convince your reader of?
Main points: What are the main points that your thesis will be broken down into? For now, it might help to think of them as headings for each stage of your argument: what mini-arguments will you make to further your overall claim?
Sub-points: How will you develop each one of these main points? Use dot-points to plan out the more detailed level of each paragraph: what aspects or elements of that main point will you mention? This is the most difficult, but a very important part of planning the structure: having an idea of the detailed level of the argument will really help you when it comes to writing it. It might help to think of having one dot-point per sentence or two in the final paragraph;
Evidence: Most importantly, what evidence will you use to support each main point? You should have several different sources under each paragraph to build a strong argument that synthesises evidence. Use a rough form of Harvard in-text reference (author year page number) to note this, and try to make it a correct in-text Harvard reference in preparation for writing paragraphs. Zotero might help you to format your references. Ensure that you can locate the source and make a note of any good quotations or paraphrases you would like to use. You will need a full reference list in the correct format for all of the sources you refer to in your plan.
Scope: How many words will you devote to each main point? Plan for your introduction and conclusion to take about 10% of the word count each, and then divide the remaining number of words between your main points. This helps you to assess whether you have the space to make your points as detailed as you want them to be.
Assignment 4: Draft Introduction and Paragraph
This assignment allows you to draft a maximum of two paragraphs from your essay for feedback and marks in this assignment. One of these will be your draft introduction, so it is important to have a good idea of what your whole argument and its component parts will be for you to write an effective introduction. Once you have a good plan, this should not be too difficult.
The second section will be a paragraph that you have selected from the body of the essay that you feel unsure about or would like particular feedback on – please ensure that you have attached a short Reference List in Harvard format that lists only the sources you have referred to in your paragraph.
Elements to consider for your introduction include:
Does your introduction effectively express the main argument of your whole essay? Is there a clear thesis statement that tells the reader what you will argue in the main body? Ensure that everything in your introduction is kept at the general level of discussion – save the details for the main body;
Is there a clear statement of the main points of your essay? Does the reader know what to expect in each major paragraph in the main body?
Is there a brief general context so that your discussion is located in the general field of knowledge? If you have substantial contextual information, background, or definitions, it might be best to leave it as a main point in the body
If you have any references or quotations in your introduction, ensure that they are very general and have relevance only to the broadest level of your argument. Otherwise leave them for the main body of the essay. It is not necessary to have references in your introduction because it should only include your main argument and key points. The detailed level of argument and evidence should be presented in the paragraphs.
Elements to consider for your main body paragraph should include:
Is the main point of your paragraph clear? Is there a “topic sentence” which clearly and succinctly expresses what the paragraph will be about?
Does all of the material in the paragraph relate directly to that main point? If there is any irrelevant material, remove it and place it somewhere in your plan where it is better suited.
Is there evidence to support each sub-claim in the paragraph? It is fine to have some sentences with no references: these will be your own perspectives, interpretations or observations. However, when you are trying to convince your reader of a particular point within your paragraph, you will need some evidence to support this, so make sure you don’t have any unsubstantiated claims.
Is your referencing correct according to the Harvard system? Does your paragraph have an author surname (no initial), year, and page number if relevant? Include a page number if it is a specific point from the source that you are using or if you are quoting a source directly.
Is your reference list for this paragraph correct according to the Harvard system? Be wary of pasting bibliography entries from Zotero or Bibliobouts’ Best Biblography, as they may not be in the correct Harvard style. Use a style guide and ensure the referencing is correct, as attention to detail is important here.
Assignment 5: Major Research Essay
As mentioned, this is the major assessment task for this course, and it’s weighted quite heavily. It’s eant to be challenging and high-stakes, but the whole course is designed to prepare you to do a great job of it. If you engage fully and work hard on the Bibliobouts activity, write a thorough, well thought-out plan, and then work hard on your draft paragraphs and take on board feedback from them, you should do quite well at this essay. If you save your hard work until the end, you will find it difficult to complete the assignment to a satisfactory level.
A Research Essay should be a clear, well-structured statement of argument on a particular topic or question, using substantial scholarly references as support. The research nature of the essay means that it is quite possible to produce an “original contribution to knowledge”, i.e. some new ideas that the reader has not thought of. It is not expected that you will produce research at an Honours or Postgraduate level, but that you can demonstrate the potential to move towards this level fo research activity.
The initial broad area of focus you are given at the beginning of the course (“Factors that contribute to the success or failure of students in tertiary education”) will not be sufficiently narrow enough for your final essay. You will therefore need to define your focus area through the research stage by critically analysing the broad area after doing some research and reading. You will have had the opportunity to select an area of particular interest to you and draft your personal essay topic in consultation with the Course Coordinator. Once you have developed your essay question you will need to focus on that and undertake substantial research, so be wary of changing your mind too much as that will disperse your energies.
This course is the only one in the whole UPP that has a formal end-of-semester examination. This is because, no matter what area you study in, you are highly likely to do an exam at some point. The purpose of this exam is largely to familiarise you with the process of doing an exam at this University, and the experience of completing a formal exam. The content of the exam will cover the broad areas of research that you have been working in this semester. Note that the weighting is very light so it should not influence your overall grade for the course very much.
Details about the time and date of the exam will be published later in the semester, but for now it is important for you to be familiar with the following information: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/student/exams/
Note in particular the process and strict deadline for applying for Alternative Exam Arrangements through the Disability Service: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/student/exams/aea.html
Tong, Allison, Sainsbury, Peter & Craig, Jonathan 2007, 'Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) : a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups', International Journal for Quality in Health Care, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 349-357.
SubmissionAll assignments will be electronically submitted via MyUni, although the Research Portfolio may be submitted via hard copy in class.
Students may be granted extensions to assignments on medical or compassionate grounds; documentation to support these ground will be required. Requests for extension must be made before the due date; requests for extension submitted after the due date will not be considered. All extension requests must be submitted to the Course Coordinator (Chad Habel: email@example.com); any extensions granted by the lecturer or tutor will not be considered valid.
All extension requests will be administered according to the
Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment Policy: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/3303/
For a concise information sheet on this policy, please visit
Penalties for Late Submission
Unless the Course Profile states otherwise when an assessment is submitted after the due date, and without an extension, 5% of the total mark possible will be deducted for every 24 hours or part thereof that it is late, including each day on a weekend. For example, an essay that is submitted after the due date and time but within the first 24 hour period, and that has been graded at 63%, will have 5% deducted, for a final grade of 58%. An essay that is more than 24 hours late will lose 10%, etc. Hard copy submissions made after 5.00pm on a Friday will be assumed to have been submitted on the next business day and will be penalised 5% per day for every day including weekend days and public holidays. This penalty may be increased where the assignment is to be completed in
a period of less than a week.
This course aims to return assessed work within 2 weeks of its submission, although this cannot be guaranteed. The resubmission of assignments is not possible for this course, except in exceptional circumstances as approved by the Course Coordinator.
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme) Grade Mark Description FNS Fail No Submission F 1-49 Fail P 50-64 Pass C 65-74 Credit D 75-84 Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction CN Continuing NFE No Formal Examination RP Result Pending
Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Final results for this course will be made available through Access Adelaide.
The University places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the University to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.This course (and the UPP itself) is still quite new, and so there is not a lot of long-term data on which to base evaluations. However, SELTs so far have shown broad agreement with most of the important points. Open-ended responses have been very useful and deserve some comment, as
- All students commented that they would recommend the course to other students, indicating a perception of value;
- Some comments indicated that the expectations regarding assignments could be made clearer earlier on; this has been responded to in the Course Profile for “University Research” with much more detail on assignments, and rubrics to be made available on MyUni;
- Some general comments and anecdotal feedback indicate that some people would prefer more groupwork, and more time in class to work on assignments due to conflicting priorities in life. There are several aspects of a response to this:
- Time to actually work on assignments in class is unlikely to be expanded; this is because much of the workload for University courses in general is comprised of independent study time (the statement on workload is available in course profiles to clarify this). In regular University courses no class time at all is given to working on assignments and it is expected that this will all be done independently; therefore the UPP will reflect this.
- Having said this, we acknowledge that it is important to allow time for discussion of assessment requirements and questions to be answered in a face-to-face setting. This will be established at the beginning of the course and time given to it several (2-3) weeks before each assignment is due.
- Groupwork certainly is important for learning, and although “University Research” has no groupwork component itself, lots of opportunities for collaborative learning will be built in. In particular, feedback has suggested the value of critical discussionof journal articles, and there will be multiple opportunities for peer review and feedback on major assignments.
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and speaking skills
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- International Student Support
- AUU Student Care - Advocacy, confidential counselling, welfare support and advice
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
- Reasonable Adjustments to Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
- LinkedIn Learning
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangement Policy
- Academic Honesty Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Elder Conservatorium of Music Noise Management Plan
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student’s disciplinary procedures.
The University of Adelaide is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The University of Adelaide therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.