Professional Accreditation

The primary purpose of professional accreditation is to ensure that graduates from specific programs are professionally qualified and competent.

The University recognises that external accreditation of its programs by professional bodies is an important component of a quality assurance framework.

During the process of professional accreditation a program is assessed against predetermined criteria within certain specified categories (for example, objectives, curriculum content, resourcing, staff profile), with the aim of reaching a conclusion about whether the program meets minimum standards set by the relevant accrediting body.

For further information about professional accreditation please contact Education Quality.

The professional accreditation of programs offered by the University is conducted by a variety of accrediting bodies such as the Institute of Chartered Accountants Australia, Engineers Australia and the Australian Medical Council.

The University has no influence over the accreditation process and fully recognises the independence of the accrediting bodies. However, the University has established certain procedural practices to ensure that all instances of accreditation are recorded, that a schedule of impending accreditations is maintained and that issues identified through accreditation are formally addressed by the University.

The University also recognises that reports by accrediting bodies are a valuable source of information about the quality of programs offered by the University. This information is of interest to external organisations such as TEQSA and issues identified during an accreditation are relevant to program reviews and annual monitoring. For these reasons, copies of all reports provided by professional accreditation bodies and any associated documentation are to be held centrally within the University.

In order to facilitate this process, the University has adopted the following principles:

  1. recognises the independence of all organisations conducting the professional accreditation of a program.
  2. supports the seeking of professional accreditation of a program where and whenever such accreditation improves the quality of a program and/or enhances the employment opportunities of graduates.
  3. requires that all issues identified through professional accreditation are reported to the appropriate University committee(s).
  4. will maintain a schedule of all impending professional accreditations.
  5. will maintain a record of all accreditations for a period of seven years.
  6. requires that information obtained from professional accreditations is available for quality assurance purposes in program reviews and TEQSA audits.
  7. requires that issues identified through accreditation processes are addressed promptly and systematically.

The accreditation procedures used by the various professional bodies vary significantly. Some are very formal, involve lengthy site visits and require significant input by staff members, whereas others are less formal and involve limited staff input.

Although the University has no control over the actual accreditation process of an individual professional body, the University requires that the following procedures are observed for all programs being accredited:

An accreditation process checklist is available.

  • Annual notification

    Each Executive Dean will inform the DVC&VP(A) of all accreditations that will occur in the following academic year.

    Education Quality (EQ) will contact each Executive Dean in the second half of the year prior in order to facilitate this process.

  • Accreditation submission

    Documentation required by accrediting bodies will be prepared within the relevant school, the final draft approved by the Executive Dean and forwarded under the Provost's signature to the accrediting body.

    The Executive Dean will ensure that, a copy of the *final draft is provided to Education Quality at least two weeks prior to the planned sign-off by the Provost as part of the University's quality assurance process and to ensure that senior management are aware of the accreditation.

    *Submissions that are in progress (ie not final draft) or still require proofreading should not be submitted. 

  • Site visits

    Individual schools will coordinate site visits and meetings with school staff in accordance with the requirements of the accrediting body.

    At completion of the visit, the members of the accrediting body will meet with the Executive Dean and Provost to discuss any major issues identified during the visit.

  • Accreditation report and response

    Upon completion of the accreditation process the accrediting body considers the information that it has collected and produces a report that identifies any issues that need attention by the University in order to satisfy the requirements for accreditation.

    The relevant Executive Dean will ensure that a response addressing any issues is forwarded to the accrediting body within 60 days of receipt of the report (or earlier if required by the accrediting body).

    The Executive Dean will ensure that an implementation plan to resolve any identified issues is developed and implemented by the end of the following semester.

  • Reporting outcomes within the University

    The Executive Dean shall report accreditation changes to Education Quality (EQ) within 14 days of being notified by the accrediting body in order that a material change notification can be made to TEQSA within legislative timeframe. Accreditation changes include any conditions placed on the accreditation and/or the details of the arrangements made for remaining students if the accreditation has been revoked.

    The Executive Dean shall also report accreditation changes to Academic Board.

    The Executive Dean shall ensure that copies of the report, the faculty's response and the implementation plan are provided to the DVC&VP(A), who will refer the documents to the University Education Committee and Academic Board to address any University-wide issues identified.

    The DVC&VP(A) will authorise the display of information relating to any accreditation undertaken for the purpose of quality improvement on the Learning website.

    For information regarding reporting requirements contact Education Compliance.

    For information regarding professional accreditation contact Education Quality.

  • Marketing accredited programs

    Faculties and schools must not state a Program is professionally accredited in any marketing or promotional material (including but not limited to: Degree Finder, any other University web page, flyers/brochures) until professional accreditation confirmation is received from the accrediting body.

  • Records

    Education Quality will maintain on the Learning website:

    • A schedule of all accreditations due in the next 3 years; and
    • Details of all accreditations conducted over the previous 7 years.

    The Executive Dean will oversee the accreditation process, which includes preparation of the accreditation submission, coordination of site visits and the lodging of copies of all correspondence, reports, implementation plans and accreditation certificates with the Records Management Office (RMO).

Programs at the University are accredited by professional organisations. Such accreditation ensures that graduates of a program are professionally qualified and competent to work in their chosen vocation. It also serves as a quality measure for individual programs.

The individual professional organisations accredit programs for varying periods of time. Accreditation schedules for each of the University faculties are detailed below.

Accreditation schedule for each faculty